Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D413A0AE1
for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:09:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1eKEXmF32zxO for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.168.224.13])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940C33A0AEE
for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21])
by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP
id 107J9DVp017966 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:09:13 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A725520CF19
for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:09:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr
[132.166.192.12])
by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA0D20CE76
for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:09:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.1.83] ([10.14.1.83])
by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP
id 107J9DTm027900 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:09:13 +0100
To: 6gip@ietf.org
References: <CAC8QAcehdY7ZMM528EurJ-H5WCbPM_YodBi3uE=MwZBnSUT2Yg@mail.gmail.com>
<FRAPR01MB1252B940C4B52CDE23AD42D6D1FC0@FRAPR01MB1252.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
<DB7PR06MB47926584901A75CEFB5973E7B5FC0@DB7PR06MB4792.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
<b301c27d-db9b-9ff8-3771-fc86c5f58dee@ninetiles.com>
<FRAPR01MB1252A810545FF74ADF7C4716D1F40@FRAPR01MB1252.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
<5c891c8d-62b6-c0af-5388-984d301fe408@gmail.com>
<099804f7-3704-c015-71bc-2b094ee3ea53@gmail.com>
<18919675-ea7c-ae93-1e53-7625340a081d@tu-dresden.de>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <03859cfc-2635-09ac-b66b-2556afcc7a91@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:09:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <18919675-ea7c-ae93-1e53-7625340a081d@tu-dresden.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/qdpMraYjTR0woTAuMj_h2AyCT4E>
Subject: Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)"
<6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>,
<mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:09:17 -0000
Le 07/01/2021 à 20:05, Frank Fitzek a écrit : > Happy New Year ! > > Are there already 5G SA networks? Or better on which networks did the > author test the data rate? SA and NSA makes a huge difference. SA? Security Association? NSA? National Security Agency? I will gladly consider the SA/NSA distinction with the SFR and Free deployments I know here where I live. But I dont know what it means. Alex > FF > > > > On 07/01/2021 19:02, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: >> >> I recently read an article in the New York Times where the writer >> tested a few 5G smartphones on some cellular networks and some places >> in USA. >> >> He said that 5G bandwidth looked higher than 4G+ to him in some places >> but he felt that better in open areas rather than indoors. It was not >> significantly higher, just a little bit higher. >> >> I think what 5G needs is these intelligent reflecting surfaces which >> might help increase coverage in a more energy-efficient manner, maybe >> less risky for health, and avoid somehow in some cases societal >> opposition. >> >> We cant dream about hundred Gbit/s bandwidths for IP on 6G if the >> increase from 4G to 5G bandwidths is not at leastten times more. >> >> If 4G is 50Mbit/s and 5G is 100Mbit/s then we cant expect 6G to be >> 100GBit/s. >> >> Le 03/12/2020 à 12:32, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit : >>> 3. use of meta surfaces (aka Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces). This is >>> a feature newly proposed in 6G that was never mentioned in earlier >>> generations, but it is a natural tool in the bag of the radio inclined >>> designer. If range is not enough then put a reflecing surface there to >>> extend the range. New in 6G is that these surfaces seem to be more >>> intelligent at PHY layer - it's not just a piece of concrete (like a >>> mirror) but some nano electronics are put on it to reflect in a more >>> intelligent way. >> > > -- > > Frank H.P. Fitzek > Professor > Deutsche Telekom Chair of Communication Networks > Institute of Communication Technology > Technische Universität Dresden > > mobile: +49 151 160 00003 > phone: +49 351 463 33945 > fax: +49 351 463 37163 > > web: cn.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de > > > > 5G Lab Germany - Coordinator - 5Glab.de > CeTI - Speaker - ceti.tu-dresden.de > Smart System Hub - Speaker - smart-systems-hub.de > >
- [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting David Lake
- Re: [6gip] Slides from IETF 109 Side Meeting John Grant
- [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Frank Fitzek
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Frank Fitzek
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G David Lake
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G John Grant
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [6gip] continueing the discussion on B5G Rex Buddenberg