[6gip] Ethics problems in 5G deployments

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EEC3A13AC for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 01:03:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id giI14GSPPYZj for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 01:03:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6403A13AA for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 01:03:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10E93Vqp014726 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:03:31 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CE5C1205E17 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:03:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32D9205E15 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:03:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.0.90] ([10.14.0.90]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10E93UJ7018043 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:03:31 +0100
To: "6gip@ietf.org" <6gip@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <383e51df-aaf0-e899-9fe8-7f035ec4d9a0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:03:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2ACD76917149F1E357F1823B"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/z3zBN8sk-t8SpcQFufALTnAw5mQ>
Subject: [6gip] Ethics problems in 5G deployments
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:03:37 -0000

There are some Ethics problems with 5G deployments.

In some place people set fire on what they thought to be a public 5G 
base station (it was a DAB station but that's not important).

When last time people set fire on some roadway side units, the entire 
deployment, valuable in the range of hundreds of millions of euros, was 
stopped and discarded.  Not only money was lost but devices stay there 
in the nature for a few years now, which is not very good.

A related problem is the understanding (or not understanding) of the 
influence of the frequencies used on 5G on brains of humans, or on 
pregnant women, or on radio-sensitive persons.  Some health aspects led 
directly to consultation to doctors and change of lifestyle, like e.g. 
sleep under a radio-protective cover, like a sort of Faraday cage.

There are many issues with these things that I tend to qualify as 
Ethics.  They should be considered.

Maybe what is done wrong in 5G that led to this constestatory situation 
(we did not see protests against 4G or 3G deployments) could be improved 
and to have a better position for 6G deployments to avoid these problems.

Alex