Re: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <> Tue, 20 March 2018 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA04512D82F for <>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGmaJYhwHUBU for <>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B471200C5 for <>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=12854; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1521534709; x=1522744309; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=8KDY5BY6N7RWHG/Ei5glNjD54GjLJGAJlwxgI7vyCsA=; b=Kkr4oZ0aRkmwtoSjy6W7VC+8FT6Ar3XQ1NfORepqnqwdQMZb6WGJtU0t MexKiSPGuDoiFOGVpmOu9QZXl+7PMo1oXjqhDmdGd41q0Wic7bATUAUMd F0UKUBZgAJiIYQwjfttjXVGgIfJu8pyQ7G7JePVFXfTnJb6nxxLb+Lnh4 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CEAQC6xbBa/4cNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJaSS1mcigKg1OKHY19ggOBFo5zhQ+CEgsjhG4CGoMtITQYAQI?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQECayiFJQEBAQQjClwCAQgRBAEBKwICAjAdCAIEARIIhC5kD6g2giaIY?= =?us-ascii?q?IIOhTOCFYFVhHSBQYFdAgOBH4NMgmEDmDsJAoYKiSCBWIN9h2iCHocVhl8CERM?= =?us-ascii?q?BgSkBHjiBUnAVgm0BAQENCYJaawEIjRR0j0qBGAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.48,334,1517875200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="86608341"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2018 08:31:48 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2K8VmFt006254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:31:48 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:31:47 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:31:47 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <>
To: Thomas Watteyne <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h
Thread-Index: AQHTv8XjS6F6HNn7ykGCmM0ZN9cP1KPYxJbg
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:31:32 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:31:24 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_dc4b79f0f59e4d7dbbeee4abe0992a8aXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6lo Fragmentation Design Team <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:31:51 -0000

Hello Thomas :

You are correct, the slides after slide 3 are for backup / background, not to be presented there.

How much more content would you think I should present? I’ve discussed it so many times in the past.


From: 6lo-fragmentation-dt <> On Behalf Of Thomas Watteyne
Sent: lundi 19 mars 2018 21:04
Subject: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h


As you know we have a 40min slot in the 6lo WG (

We have been preparing slides at (look for the "ietf101_6lo_frag_dt_" prefix)

Quick action items:
- all, please take a look and flag things you don't like
- @Carsten, do you agree to present the 6lo-minimal-fragment section?
- @Carsten, do you agree to officially call lwig-6lowpan-virtual-reassembly replaced by 6lo-minimal-fragment ?
- @Pascal, from you slideset (which I just renamed, I didn't change the contents), only slides 1-3 seem to be meant for presentation. I would suggest you expand a bit of those, and remove all the past presentations at the end. Agreed?

Once I get everyones answer, I will put merge all of them and send to the 6lo chairs (deadline EOD tomorrow Tuesday).



Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Analog Devices
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH<>