Re: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 20 March 2018 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C759B124319 for <6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgUdFGIPAF_W for <6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62640124207 for <6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1521542980; x=1522752580; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=25lIWICJDEbmEd6w7n54dp3lWca2tBziNZLpGuRmN64=; b=imrhV8V89es/Nh03YJpMTHqk7jym2hv5becGf/INGr5ng0NUIvQVegbp FxtDNnJZx6UvEb/y2mZNgnF9SgEto2l21EDdExv02LZPoKawMZMs8FEmW aiF3T/OWBlcPWXC3Xc9NyQkNZUQxo/UgSRRG168Cp3/nr6Nu0DfmKOS62 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AKAQDA5rBa/4gNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNQZnIog12KHY1+ggOBFo54hQ+CEgsYAQqEbgIagy4hNBg?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgEBAQEBAQJrKIUmAQEEAQEhJiULEAIBBgIYJwMCAgIlCxQRAgQOBYQ2ZA+?= =?us-ascii?q?NAZtAgiaEboNwgg6FN4IVgVWBVCiCeIFBgV0BAQOCIYJKMIIxA5g9CQKGDYk?= =?us-ascii?q?rgU6DfYdrgh+HFYZfAhETAYEpAR44gVJwFToqAYIIAQEBDQmBcUQljgh0kGY?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,335,1517875200"; d="scan'208,217";a="369848489"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2018 10:49:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2KAndxm017762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:49:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:49:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:49:38 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org" <6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h
Thread-Index: AQHTv8XjS6F6HNn7ykGCmM0ZN9cP1KPZIRiAgAAJGYCAABwSgA==
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:49:38 +0000
Message-ID: <BC3D94E1-54CA-4AF5-A283-4CE7DCFC78C3@cisco.com>
References: <CADJ9OA-TnK3x-C2+H3omTSmWiVEKbRVLrguTcJno6t4eDEOH9A@mail.gmail.com> <4BBC9548-2941-411C-AF84-8281921752C9@tzi.org> <CADJ9OA81dCOq252z55+L=RGi42B0o=EXfUASiQv=WhZAVjFinQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA81dCOq252z55+L=RGi42B0o=EXfUASiQv=WhZAVjFinQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BC3D94E154CA4AF5A2834CE7DCFC78C3ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo-fragmentation-dt/SYpVhU4YblW2gA9_aHhk9T7PIwo>
Subject: Re: [6lo-fragmentation-dt] slides for 6lo@IETF101 - please review in the next 24h
X-BeenThere: 6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6lo Fragmentation Design Team <6lo-fragmentation-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo-fragmentation-dt>, <mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo-fragmentation-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo-fragmentation-dt>, <mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:49:47 -0000

I meant them to be placed in as back matter but you can remove them if you prefer 😊


Regards,

Pascal

Le 20 mars 2018 à 09:08, Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr<mailto:thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>> a écrit :

Pascal,
3 slides is perfect, let's keep it simple. Do you agree we remove the other ones?

Carsten,
Perfect, I'll be merging everything tonight, and can incorporate your suggestions at that time, if any.

Thomas

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org<mailto:cabo@tzi.org>> wrote:
On Mar 19, 2018, at 21:04, Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr<mailto:thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As you know we have a 40min slot in the 6lo WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-6lo).
>
> We have been preparing slides at https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/src/master/180321_ietf101_london/ (look for the "ietf101_6lo_frag_dt_" prefix)
>
> Quick action items:
> - all, please take a look and flag things you don’t like

Have to survive CORE + CBOR first.

> - @Carsten, do you agree to present the 6lo-minimal-fragment section?

Sure, once I have looked at the slides…

> - @Carsten, do you agree to officially call lwig-6lowpan-virtual-reassembly replaced by 6lo-minimal-fragment ?

We should state that is the intention after the next respin.

> - @Pascal, from you slideset (which I just renamed, I didn't change the contents), only slides 1-3 seem to be meant for presentation. I would suggest you expand a bit of those, and remove all the past presentations at the end. Agreed?
>
> Once I get everyones answer, I will put merge all of them and send to the 6lo chairs (deadline EOD tomorrow Tuesday).
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> ________________________________________
>
> Thomas Watteyne, PhD
> Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
> Sr Networking Design Eng, Analog Devices
> Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
> Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH
>
> www.thomaswatteyne.com<http://www.thomaswatteyne.com>
> ________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo-fragmentation-dt mailing list
> 6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org<mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo-fragmentation-dt




--
________________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Analog Devices
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com<http://www.thomaswatteyne.com>
________________________________________
_______________________________________________
6lo-fragmentation-dt mailing list
6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org<mailto:6lo-fragmentation-dt@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo-fragmentation-dt