Re: [6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-15.txt
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 20 July 2015 07:30 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BC81A0102 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYAxPvjnD6u5 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B751A00FE for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1428814B for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b22f.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:5c86:66c:cff3:4e20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7571369461 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: 6lo@ietf.org
References: <20150720070208.4584.36904.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55ACA22E.3080006@tzi.org>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <55ACA383.8070200@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 03:30:11 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55ACA22E.3080006@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NqqTKVgIqIIm7aBnLBwxdhLIoaE3JLj2P"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/1l8OCZilJfshqxwcW5fJZ0w_vAg>
Subject: Re: [6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-15.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:30:16 -0000
Hi Carsten, On 7/20/15 3:24 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Thanks for the new draft. > > Again, we have to be careful what exactly we are saying here. > > The question is not whether MAC addresses are randomly generated, the > question is how trackable they are. If they are randomly generated at > manufacturing time, that is only barely better than the OUI-based method. The randomized MAC addresses are controlled by the Bluetooth specification. Are you suggesting some additional text in this document that describes how that spec directs the generation of random addresses? Regards, Brian
- [6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-15.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-15.txt Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-15.txt Brian Haberman