[6lo] Revision 18 of draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 10 April 2018 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CE612DA13; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgAVL8Jn7jzo; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC6912E888; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3AFVbF1030854; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:31:38 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340132203A; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:31:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285E92203C; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:31:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (81.38.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.38.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3AFVami027513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:31:37 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: rtg-ads@ietf.org
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update.all@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:31:36 +0100
Message-ID: <036d01d3d0e1$03c09c90$0b41d5b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdPQ38qs+fdnttJlTaWS4J//4b8onQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23776.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.690-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.690-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23776.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--2.689900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: f6xp84cRS1FeDtEKgt5AZmA/V00XWjDth8Ytn75ClDOo+b+yOP0oGOhu cPsHg+lURNg+Ky3/qcWRk6XtYogiarQ/aqQZTRfKrjgFvJKloAc20PITYKXjDUV6OQLk/jlIec3 QM3secWanSUBxY5Mc6nTfwnkNrdu/O829VkZYeg19/smO30kTvZ45eexK3GMqCQKeQDeH+fUPvT V19UCLO5Iv06+1Rxr97r4PjzaceGt+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/2SeEaoNzAnGGFI2mcwSk4WARPYo>
Subject: [6lo] Revision 18 of draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:31:47 -0000

Hi,

Looking at revision 18 of this draft, it seems my RTG Dir review has been
addressed.

Thanks to the authors for their work.

Adrian