Re: [6lo] uncompressed form

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 23 May 2019 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989C81200B3; Thu, 23 May 2019 05:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=k2GqwOMf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=bVmMiEDQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gDqZjfW9-Zvz; Thu, 23 May 2019 05:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEA9B12002F; Thu, 23 May 2019 05:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11266; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1558613553; x=1559823153; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=hRsopkeE/cLb2RZWarhY8REGNsrz0dF1ZmGpNj20Ayk=; b=k2GqwOMfS8qZ7286uREjgEGAOUWTJ/1qXSWmKZYuzs4DBtjTczugivC2 weSVvNcW7F/pQndSgENE+VNHtMDCZ6R1/UDpmYTg805KHqX//B379vZ9u k6MqO9OZaPIUWdvFF9X5nFCVUWC4l8eGPjSA+dZNdqhkk+L9RYn1Zi+zS k=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AzGgvghDLvim6GSGnCqtdUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs03kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHw?= =?us-ascii?q?QAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuNOLqciY3BthqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AIAAAtjeZc/5FdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDi9QA2lVIAQLKIQTg0cDhFKKI4JXiUCJGYR?= =?us-ascii?q?QgS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhEACF4IhIzQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQRtHAyFSgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEDEhEKEwEBNwEPAgEIEQQBASgDAgICHxEUCQgBAQQOBQgagwGBHU0DHQE?= =?us-ascii?q?Cmy0CgTeIX3GBL4J5AQEFhQkNC4IPCYE0AYtQF4FAP4FXgkw+gReBA4FyOjS?= =?us-ascii?q?CVDKCJo4HhF6IIY0BOQkCgg2MdII2g3yWNpU0jQ0CBAIEBQIOAQEFgU84gVd?= =?us-ascii?q?wFYMngRd4g3CKU3KBKY06AQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,503,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="561935207"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 23 May 2019 12:08:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4NC8sub003337 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 May 2019 12:08:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:08:53 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:08:53 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:08:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hRsopkeE/cLb2RZWarhY8REGNsrz0dF1ZmGpNj20Ayk=; b=bVmMiEDQJIMW/WXVckOLubblsP+Yu0+otzaS5UfaJvuHwpZuJpbjKY/8zHPr0YQ5PT/erkVh+OuBAVzhvRsXdOpYtFHhIy2WJ3t/yGqacbGG2ALASNVH484cGe9lJ2SO3ucpTOsOz4+I3v6RQtvFmXVK1/OE3gIgTl0WEEQqcJY=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.206.75) by BYAPR11MB2983.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.224.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.18; Thu, 23 May 2019 12:08:52 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b587:2f5d:3be6:656f]) by BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b587:2f5d:3be6:656f%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1922.018; Thu, 23 May 2019 12:08:52 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] uncompressed form
Thread-Index: AdURKvL6Hj4FcJwbS6KqysSdvCZWcwAMAOoAAAEpC7A=
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:08:29 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:06:48 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB35580DE13386308CD7B2698ED8010@BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB35653193798C9BA9DD1525A7D8010@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CADnDZ8_aBKp0yH22K0HiRPPZUrjcqJ2vezKpXjdd+tGwMvobpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_aBKp0yH22K0HiRPPZUrjcqJ2vezKpXjdd+tGwMvobpA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1007::229]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d9eb014c-ef1b-4048-8e16-08d6df776c29
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB2983;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2983:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB2983FE6CA8204045BB458F81D8010@BYAPR11MB2983.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 00462943DE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(51444003)(189003)(199004)(486006)(8936002)(33656002)(476003)(68736007)(11346002)(446003)(256004)(53936002)(6436002)(790700001)(6116002)(4326008)(6246003)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(6916009)(9686003)(76116006)(54896002)(66476007)(6306002)(73956011)(66946007)(6666004)(236005)(71200400001)(71190400001)(25786009)(2906002)(55016002)(1411001)(229853002)(478600001)(52536014)(86362001)(7696005)(81156014)(102836004)(81166006)(14454004)(99286004)(8676002)(6506007)(53546011)(186003)(76176011)(316002)(5660300002)(54906003)(46003)(74316002)(7736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB2983; H:BYAPR11MB3558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9RZOALg9763RIEIBXFG5g/or4NJEqDkyPccRH3lhyzQjyTjTKLs8EcLSN+qOAA5k3rVJjgiKX4TXxI4hfU4THSnvWeY13q1HnCXPCTn8+yq9xmIO6loi3m9k7Uk5QmNjdV4pMplO+jhd+vwSpUZqQlkl3umHj2j0jqa0+V6zim47/8WAEiH0EMNDBi7e4KBb2Hk2s1Eu2NbK2LCKbcq5qYiUROD8s5zV151XDMh21vyCFh0qu4GC701h1hWAi/INU8RruuFQbA+fvqMsjxjgfYB7G9jYqqdWgR616V6it1uTkkdipT7uDMfLYGpy03XtQePnOWnxtplwZoYkzLEy673KDwWmpzMqZ3Ic4XyKvXOY3Co77ka1vAUEfeHLyPjsYBW+f2BCNhsqp4pjOteHuJcJoy0Zf16dbq5/J0fsDoQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB35580DE13386308CD7B2698ED8010BYAPR11MB3558namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d9eb014c-ef1b-4048-8e16-08d6df776c29
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 May 2019 12:08:52.4271 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2983
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.26, xch-aln-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/2V5fPiJJ1g8I3Vt9uS7CxP3jgvQ>
Subject: Re: [6lo] uncompressed form
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:12:37 -0000

Dear all

The use case is when the data sync is not in the RPL domain or the packet has to fly outside the RPL domain. E.g., A PLC virtualized in a MEC. The root needs to uncompress the packet and forward. The draft is missing the uncompressed form.

All the best,

Pascal

From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>;
Sent: jeudi 23 mai 2019 13:31
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>;
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] uncompressed form



On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:54 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all:

I was rereading deadline and realized that the draft does not provide an umcompressed form. What of the packet flies beyond the RPL domain? I think the information should be useful there too.

why useful? could you explain the use case?

Also we always claimed that RFC8138 is an encoding and that we can always turn a packet to uncompressed and back. Deadline creates an exception to that rule, which changes RFC 8138 into a sub IP protocol as opposed to a compression.
All in all, I think that an IPv6 header (e.g., a new option in a hop-by-hop header) should be provided, even if for now it appears to be for completeness only.

What do others think?

I need to know the use case.

Best regards,
AB