Re: [6lo] uncompressed form

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2019 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C961C1200D6; Thu, 23 May 2019 04:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ED7u4Z0XQxe; Thu, 23 May 2019 04:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4301200C7; Thu, 23 May 2019 04:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id c3so5083216otr.3; Thu, 23 May 2019 04:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VIhKAcg9LXBBEqCewRvBtLws31GijbwnW8Divtj+oCA=; b=rxPweMS2tPcUF/QuvrKTuTvLWzy49p+ywcUJlKse9S/HBibEP7gzTotz42bSQz/fjq AEngUXZDQWjY6AZuAFfecvKE29889FxqtkaKzrpLzN21nZDChOiJmeLqWexeChGZJu6p /VTc9c8WtuNi4WEVGpri4//ka8MXA2bTGfFRT+X0ViYzHdRqgtILmnNzgbdcqmzlcZLs FFxd7a9IhMLZByggsHs2LClDU0zsMw6DyDkNJ5hbiq5ZGvMTng2dVqPPGXuI+mBv8/MH Mk4wFDDT5OI1N+GktLPahT60u4UUM70ge2HIBUAKvizKuSKCbFwcvy1TbjuFbrRlNlk/ GyPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VIhKAcg9LXBBEqCewRvBtLws31GijbwnW8Divtj+oCA=; b=oSWkVyMFagGAlMORcArlodSCsk7joFbr15exW1yk1iYckBWCsMarTDzpjprq5U3Egh 8B6KDkf3AFRa/J3gO3QgNGmQ1KdgUO0jV2kF64hUOQnAuL+hDJ454ye9UNm/GiogvPZG KHWVCZNFJ5JOdGHHfUXHMRKlkxFLGtJNlU20GIfmlHvfPDo2gdhpXdBiBuDLkT4qFAaG IZzer3zmFhw2XSijpVFyKYR9a9g3kQpdUnfCR8b8bQQvq9xk23bU5N7zynw+ndfD435i X/1SGXFOwH75vrOK1FrZ1+mYb9TUYRw97PrdjTkqzfpmEPlJ4RmeMBmqx9ytGBahMc/F L+hA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWvC7WS4AiA2EI6qwBC0rxrdX+KCaz/8OKDMKp28yMSMX+3wOip Naa1Rpx/hqm/WICtiGFfpFssLLpV343FPeF15Do=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy82kYK8ksaIzGJXS+fQt3FpCKyAaDFpfeOSTa06V2bP9Ditva19v47gL74sGSbkP2jfsJWRb1b7DUAlD+XdWk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6116:: with SMTP id i22mr19529450otj.13.1558611066380; Thu, 23 May 2019 04:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35653193798C9BA9DD1525A7D8010@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35653193798C9BA9DD1525A7D8010@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:30:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_aBKp0yH22K0HiRPPZUrjcqJ2vezKpXjdd+tGwMvobpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f47a9b05898c6a2c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/3X22eWHndj4LkVnYffGkaZgdygU>
Subject: Re: [6lo] uncompressed form
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 11:31:09 -0000

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:54 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear all:
>
> *   I was rereading deadline and realized that the draft does not provide
> an umcompressed form. What of the packet flies beyond the RPL domain? I
> think the information should be useful there too. *
>

why useful? could you explain the use case?


> * Also we always claimed that RFC8138 is an encoding and that we can
> always turn a packet to uncompressed and back. Deadline creates an
> exception to that rule, which changes RFC 8138 into a sub IP protocol as
> opposed to a compression. All in all, I think that an IPv6 header (e.g., a
> new option in a hop-by-hop header) should be provided, even if for now it
> appears to be for completeness only.   What do others think?*
>

I need to know the use case.

Best regards,
AB

>
>
>
>
>
>
>