IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-06 through July 11

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C39C12EC06; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMpwxVUDnRPQ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA76B129B29; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1516; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1499927834; x=1501137434; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5Wb5vTFldEBLaO2+sKm+ZYxy08Rm5SDYSX6lcUMbccA=; b=YhrnrZoK6Ql2NNOrdnzPVPuwqqXK9NUmJw9qUfKJAEpawc8Evm9lPMhP hlNQUI1qqi79/XUVx3uF6SnNoJUwsKqH0QBAt9NBOn2qt4wSRs5DcdnCF 9d3acpLIEr/n42aZSOa5kyyoDiTLp88fRe6slEGreRZZAlW8nUhTM/T1I o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CYAADzE2dZ/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgy8rgXgHjgKRcpYDghGFdgIag0A/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRgBAQEBAyMRRQwEAgEGAg4DBAEBAQICIwMCAgIwFAEICAEBBAENBQgXh3sBghSQE51kgiaLIgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4Idg02FBYE8gzUzglmCYQEEnywClAWCFZAbiUOMDwEfOIEKdRWHX3aHTIENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,352,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="452575133"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Jul 2017 06:37:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6D6bDD7017207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:37:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:37:13 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:37:13 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
CC: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-06 through July 11
Thread-Index: AdLvmoCPIn9d1IUORHKpl4KnCC0bkALutZ3wABzkXwAACirIgA==
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:37:07 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:36:21 +0000
Message-ID: <f1bcc12057f34591a2841c293d50f55b@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <SN1PR21MB0096F72994DF9E54488FE6B895DC0@SN1PR21MB0096.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <BY2PR21MB00817E022DE5B565C6F4AAAD95AF0@BY2PR21MB0081.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <F2ADFF73-7A47-4D98-AD77-5DA2C80412D3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F2ADFF73-7A47-4D98-AD77-5DA2C80412D3@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.87.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/8VJKy3v1wq24Yl3Qa7iAndYwqnc>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-06 through July 11
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:37:16 -0000

Good point Carsten:

I think it makes sense to recall that this and the backbone router drafts were implemented, demonstrated and tested during the ETSI 6TiSCH PlugTests. The experience from implementation was retrofitted in the drafts.

I still have a few routers handy with the Cisco implementation of the 6BBR, if people want to test their implementation of the registering node against it, in both bridging and routing proxy modes.

Take care,

Pascal



-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo@tzi.org] 
Sent: jeudi 13 juillet 2017 08:12
To: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-06 through July 11

On Jul 12, 2017, at 23:27, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> There were zero comments on this LC. 

Right.  I didn’t have the cycles to look at this, and won’t before early August.

More importantly, I believe we need feedback from implementers about this.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email