Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14
CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 14 March 2023 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDBEC1522AB for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5r_8OIbOPlQl for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96473C151557 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g18so16886185ljl.3 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; t=1678816096; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O2AFwUVmtticF7AS/CXvktTaZ/k8mg16+VzP9HwTcXg=; b=bMzuUNw5eWtA0mF77h0NIe4LgxK/ItBEfa7mtcT3qTopgFOXG7OEbe36hwPKnSiy5I 8CTFGfxeZJ10ExiE2J2qqrm34T1gnWjaxMk6uLvVJ1hkeFPfClR5ike+wM2McdesJIWs T5CMDCcdEEdJLHYBqVZauhVokt4boPVYntp+Z8/CW+ZxS9ZJR1FTVk9W/x217taa9jWK gv9SEvCOhHciOCkPycLGzMqn33TnccppO8z323ZyMh4+wXRolymBzbnQIU4zjmVn98vI fD2nT8uF7x4hzn9gQuORjiLDyurkIEfkcwRxPzbbjQXWSApj3wP46y8BWEBPJBm2zvu6 Wj9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678816096; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=O2AFwUVmtticF7AS/CXvktTaZ/k8mg16+VzP9HwTcXg=; b=ZIyFgpupwoWx8x10et/NGQfazhROIvjYuZKDdLWi4BnYdhKZ1zltD0U7eDwSdgGNet z7m4OKdpErBD6EeHw2UEtaPs1LFpN8nhbNYzC221ZnpNRHdEWlH+P2hwpWcCr5rjdqu8 6it55v8rrTGq8/08IxXpSMsZ28mgeT/d27hyB/5OZhGpJUl4M4tehKtuTcBYrjNwTpmR KNxR/23gMKh5XeYAK8ca3y+3/d6YDVXuRrPJiaKv3NkSRKP5GCpOGavtKYl4jcaEfV7T ikZ1JIS2Uu/9rWnKs9ATKl21YaJQbIdxNKZuvKMdIjN9dtoBnzfQOIomK/ln3KNlVQr3 MP/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXNxt1QM12Mu+OLGG++dOheRlyDlcp5pKZK8sl1m/cpwvdKI4ym K8+iRWBf23wRNQzkyO944WD8JnOBRQ02QVADRylBEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set84o4FiuSw5CW2hUz2Ilq1nvGSr740EBJeFhnrazFaMIF9BiRROOiZGXD99ioJ1tkxV+6r+heOXsYgTZa3sNtA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a4b7:0:b0:295:a8c7:4b3b with SMTP id g23-20020a2ea4b7000000b00295a8c74b3bmr12221443ljm.4.1678816096367; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166871208122.62712.10536103895579531276@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACt2foEq-F2Akq=BhXgeHLj+cBTLn2Y6Y+trizjQBzxykGKZSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACt2foEq-F2Akq=BhXgeHLj+cBTLn2Y6Y+trizjQBzxykGKZSw@mail.gmail.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 18:48:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CALypLp9Jqk1JJBLZsyLsvjt2COvbHPT-cuQFPZkpnpw9esCFMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000117b3605f6dfd553"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/8VL1rXJeEnxG0wtMZZRo2-_PEeM>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:48:23 -0000
Thanks for your edits. They look fine to me. Carlos On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:12 PM Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Carlos Bernardos. > > Thanks for your valuable comments and sorry for the late response. > > To resolve your comments, I updated the draft. > > Please, find inline responses. > > And, I submitted the revision draft based on your comments. > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-15.html > > It is appreciated to check again and let me know any missing points. > > Best regards. > > Yong-Geun. > > 2022년 11월 18일 (금) 오전 4:08, Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker < > noreply@ietf.org>님이 작성: > >> Reviewer: Carlos Bernardos >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases. >> These >> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area >> Directors. >> Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like >> they >> would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them >> along >> with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more >> details on >> the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. >> >> The document describes the applicability of IPv6 over 6lo networks and >> provides >> some examples of practical deployments. The document is well written and >> provides a very good set of references for the interested reader to >> continue >> digging. >> >> I think given the nature of the document, there are not issues for >> INT-AREA, as >> those aspects that would be indeed very relevant there are mostly tackled >> on >> the many other documents that are referenced. I find the document quite >> informative though and I enjoyed and learned quite a lot reading it. >> >> Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as >> YES. >> >> The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text >> improvements) >> with the document: >> >> - I would personally prefer not to have explicit references to WGs, as the >> document probably will live longer that the 6lo WG (though there are >> examples >> on the IETF for the other way around ;) ) and I think the document should >> not >> assume that the reader is familiar with IETF WGs. >> > [Hong] Update as your comment and delete explicit references to WGs. > >> >> - "for the IEEE Std 802.15.4[IEEE802159].)" --> "for the IEEE Std 802.15.4 >> [IEEE802159].)" >> > [Hong] Update as your comment >
- [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-us… Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker
- Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6l… Yong-Geun Hong
- Re: [6lo] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of dra… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6l… Yong-Geun Hong
- Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6l… CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO