[6lo] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-14: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 21 March 2020 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietf.org
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9F43A0805; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 16:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment@ietf.org, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org, Carles Gomez <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>, carlesgo@entel.upc.edu
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.122.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <158483396894.18995.6296185286849342155@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 16:39:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/8x50ktao5NP-hFbgU1MZBabBn4E>
Subject: [6lo] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:39:37 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and Comment) points!

In the security considerations, perhaps "fragment 1" would be
better as "first-fragment" to avoid questions of zero- vs. one-indexing.