Re: [6lo] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: (with COMMENT)

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Thu, 22 April 2021 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB1A3A0E89; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N4EPo33YosmV; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dash.upc.es (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA743A0E87; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.40.4]) by dash.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 13MAcAu9060144; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:38:10 +0200
Received: from wmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.40.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41F01D53C1; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:38:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 10.192.137.220 by wmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:46:05 +0200
Message-ID: <3343f8af3bc137923428ad1995e58518.squirrel@wmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <161398994628.13197.12765674149782791923@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <161398994628.13197.12765674149782791923@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:46:05 +0200
From: "Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: "Robert Wilton" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>, rahul.ietf@gmail.com, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at dash
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:24:23 by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/926lZSmRJZK0eDknAv_52ab5Iic>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:38:31 -0000

Hi Robert,

Thank you very much for your feedback, and apologies for the late response.

We just published an updated version of the draft (revision -10).

Please find below our inline responses to your comments:


> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this document.
>
> A couple of minor comments relating to the diagram in 3.2 (figure 2):
>
> (1) It wasn't clear to me why the top left node was a 6LR rather than a
> 6LN.
> If this is deliberate, it might be worth a sentence to explain the purpose
> here.

This was actually deliberate, to show that such scenario may occur and it
is supported.

As per your suggestion, we added a sentence in the paragraph after Figure
2, as follows:

NEW:
   Note that, in some scenarios, and/or for some time intervals, a 6LR may
   remain at the edge of the network (e.g. the top left node in Figure 2).
   This may happen when a 6LR has no neighboring 6LNs.

> (2) I initially found the bubble around the v6 Mesh to be confusing
> - I
> thought that it means that all the nodes are interconnected.  I'm not sure
> whether the bubble really helps the diagram, and probably could be
> removed, of
> if it is kept, I would suggest adding more space between the bubble line
> and
> the mesh network inside so that the bubble line isn't confused as
> representing
> links between the nodes.

As per your suggestion, we removed the bubble for greater clarity.

Thanks,

Carles (on behalf of the authors)


> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>