[6lo] #19 (paging-dispatch): Using page 15 for reserved for vendor special use and experiments
"6lo issue tracker" <trac+6lo@tools.ietf.org> Wed, 12 October 2016 12:19 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+6lo@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18BA1294EE for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivssAYXyeG6T for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from durif.tools.ietf.org (durif.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::3d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6E91293F4 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:57018 helo=durif.tools.ietf.org) by durif.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+6lo@tools.ietf.org>) id 1buIVE-0007eC-A0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:19:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: 6lo issue tracker <trac+6lo@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: pthubert@cisco.com
X-Trac-Project: 6lo
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:19:20 -0000
X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/6lo/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lo/trac/ticket/19
Message-ID: <057.0d02a036b166e9b0f5cb59e8908eb165@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 19
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pthubert@cisco.com, 6lo@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+6lo@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on durif.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/BIX8WxM6Fv59o987LOyFoanimYA>
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: [6lo] #19 (paging-dispatch): Using page 15 for reserved for vendor special use and experiments
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:19:22 -0000
#19: Using page 15 for reserved for vendor special use and experiments From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Sent: mercredi 12 octobre 2016 14:13 To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>; 6lo@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6lo] Reserving page 15 for experimentation: [was: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-04: (with COMMENT)] Thanks Michael! Dear all: I asked the question again at the 6TiSCH interim and people there also agreed to assign page 15 I'll be adding that to the doc; if you have a strong concern please let it be known now! Cheers, Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca] Sent: samedi 1 octobre 2016 11:19 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> Cc: 6lo@ietf.org; Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>; iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6lo] Reserving page 15 for experimentation: [was: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-04: (with COMMENT)] Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > During Spencer’s review of the paging dispatch draft, the question was raised > whether one page (say page 15) should be reserved for experimentations. > This is a classical thing to do to enable people to prototype stuff and be > sure that new standards will not use the same values as the experiment. > Is that something we should be enable here? Yes. It's a very good idea. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo -- -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: pthubert@cisco.com | Owner: pthubert@cisco.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: paging-dispatch | Version: 2.0 Severity: Submitted WG Document | Keywords: -----------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lo/trac/ticket/19> 6lo <https://tools.ietf.org/6lo/>
- [6lo] #19 (paging-dispatch): Using page 15 for re… 6lo issue tracker
- Re: [6lo] #19 (paging-dispatch): Using page 15 fo… 6lo issue tracker
- Re: [6lo] #19 (paging-dispatch): Using page 15 fo… 6lo issue tracker