Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-12: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <> Thu, 05 March 2020 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227643A07AE; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5ejLaD25ULu; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F0F3A07E1; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id d8so4179811ion.7; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:28:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZDQXT5qAbZDEnuaxBHZzWN5bZJ9i4Qql/fEvMR//uhc=; b=ZahQxvn0mjBJLrz+VBJ0EyFAJhAexzxfdJ/KlXwX1oeOvTwbaGwwwKTs1NaWxRFENj IDWmRqJLfDIirIU8lIiRqODT9xTKvI213JC1Ns/kMPdfxiFlDm7aYDoCWq9SbS7hlFSH MEZZWHX0n/OakgOcRG7OVuyO7zoRZ3RlZaXZ5hwW8nwqLTeE6s3iNoUaZSceaWOSlMVP tmNFe1iB8+OdZhpAkkHPHG0aOGTHrqbo1sPYYgmsHVXV6w8wLiqbiy/09K8CI2GZUZTM DgRIHjwpkIXX7QMcf5/81Oi6ZR0VTGm+ENZYOD4MCqkvhfrKBekMqdA3WeQl8n8RcqHZ vEgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1vvSChMLi1zz+3Cpz/9m4Evqv4twkJNPNe8LngnVWzJUb4Sz9P MvRoKCfWV7+Ozspb2Upn7ea01VvaJM3i/Ds40/A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vt8Ztq26bizVb5h98j2zNp6diWJTluX3/n+LK8W?= =?utf-8?q?tPWdeTkVMoap1pn+a/lxNg8naUGKJtJK8izsYqvduiP0kkc=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9ed4:: with SMTP id a20mr82471ioe.187.1583429327606; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:28:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> =?utf-8?q?=3CMN2PR11MB35658C671D612F88074D9F67D8E20=40MN2PR11MB3565=2Enampr?= =?utf-8?q?d11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CMN2PR11MB35658C671D612F88074D9F67D8E20=40MN2PR11MB?= =?utf-8?q?3565=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
From: Barry Leiba <>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:28:36 -0500
Message-ID: <>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <>
Cc: The IESG <>, "" <>, Carles Gomez <>, "" <>, "" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-12: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:28:50 -0000

Hi, Pascal,

> It seems that this is the review you made on version 10. I scanned and could not make a difference.

It took me a while to figure out what you were questioning, and now I
understand: you wondered why I reposted the same comments for the -12
version as I had for the -10 version.  Sorry for the confusion, but
that was just an artifact of your posting quick updates (which I do
NOT consider a problem; I'd rather see updates posted!).  The only
purpose for updating my comments, which then got attached to version
-12, was to add the comments at the bottom from Murray.  I did not
actually change any of my own comments there, and, yes, I know you did
address them (thanks!).

Again, sorry for the confusion.  All is good.