IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-12: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 05 March 2020 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227643A07AE; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5ejLaD25ULu; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F0F3A07E1; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id d8so4179811ion.7; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:28:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZDQXT5qAbZDEnuaxBHZzWN5bZJ9i4Qql/fEvMR//uhc=; b=ZahQxvn0mjBJLrz+VBJ0EyFAJhAexzxfdJ/KlXwX1oeOvTwbaGwwwKTs1NaWxRFENj IDWmRqJLfDIirIU8lIiRqODT9xTKvI213JC1Ns/kMPdfxiFlDm7aYDoCWq9SbS7hlFSH MEZZWHX0n/OakgOcRG7OVuyO7zoRZ3RlZaXZ5hwW8nwqLTeE6s3iNoUaZSceaWOSlMVP tmNFe1iB8+OdZhpAkkHPHG0aOGTHrqbo1sPYYgmsHVXV6w8wLiqbiy/09K8CI2GZUZTM DgRIHjwpkIXX7QMcf5/81Oi6ZR0VTGm+ENZYOD4MCqkvhfrKBekMqdA3WeQl8n8RcqHZ vEgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1vvSChMLi1zz+3Cpz/9m4Evqv4twkJNPNe8LngnVWzJUb4Sz9P MvRoKCfWV7+Ozspb2Upn7ea01VvaJM3i/Ds40/A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt8Ztq26bizVb5h98j2zNp6diWJTluX3/n+LK8WtPWdeTkVMoap1pn+a/lxNg8naUGKJtJK8izsYqvduiP0kkc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9ed4:: with SMTP id a20mr82471ioe.187.1583429327606; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:28:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158215049622.17596.12744561753036456780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB35658C671D612F88074D9F67D8E20@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35658C671D612F88074D9F67D8E20@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:28:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJJw=hB6=n2FMKJzL5SdsArH1P3dJnHPehsqau1SC=CXXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment@ietf.org>, Carles Gomez <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>, "6lo-chairs@ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/DezMhGC5L0emRTqr3kQo17Ij9Cs>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:28:50 -0000

Hi, Pascal,

> It seems that this is the review you made on version 10. I scanned and could not make a difference.

It took me a while to figure out what you were questioning, and now I
understand: you wondered why I reposted the same comments for the -12
version as I had for the -10 version.  Sorry for the confusion, but
that was just an artifact of your posting quick updates (which I do
NOT consider a problem; I'd rather see updates posted!).  The only
purpose for updating my comments, which then got attached to version
-12, was to add the comments at the bottom from Murray.  I did not
actually change any of my own comments there, and, yes, I know you did
address them (thanks!).

Again, sorry for the confusion.  All is good.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email