Re: [6lo] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: (with COMMENT)

Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com> Tue, 14 March 2023 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9025C1516E0; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JpV_F9y_CARg; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D525C159A24; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id s22so19548764lfi.9; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678793363; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EmCNWZHJ3B0/pgYMH0waK7gxfNxklwktSzX8kdpbtKo=; b=YqbihJ+QBx9zHEE7P0VCcSoCh86mMVcPTII0t9r//wN0PvnbXd46uAYpwN50h5G8SI 1k4h0WKkoCkC7ewg61WkBVp3oin9exAfF04Yf72Th43UVsky7vu/KhYlE+lJ787Jqcab np1on+YfBYRAzve99xdgsMEG8EXemzG9o+yu+/Ilq81QlSE/ZF5lwmlV8bxTSrD674xK JGeCxw/1USulKmWrz37ZHz4pDxhh2nCqGriY1A6SDeLwsdU8bL23OTZhDPmnsOdXVBTJ weXCl//0wUIjV/+SAhCZFwAS80K3lfEkQBofz4QKhNURVsM8tvMDKhT3JwkQugXeHHPh PS6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678793363; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=EmCNWZHJ3B0/pgYMH0waK7gxfNxklwktSzX8kdpbtKo=; b=lYm7fScqh047hom1aRg3zopewGqVpwnyriGpOqofHf/6F9ikQ8cElnuccGG+mtmZqZ qIoUPjvH5+Uswbz8UL00lX1nNt4yEnwnv2Awsx9C3e5ExVkC2sBS9GRccS/PMrO/gUid XzekcimKNvvsDxHmgFdsVT1nxP4la2zEtbyUX3aeQNxdaIarcYafjiOEXv8IRsYOKqCj qQgYe5z51iCTuTZ8wNE3PWXjdAtoAr0k3i5ErY9akyKtMdupMuzwPr0YZpgjFmOBgvZx aNbW5vpU8NXi4vDcMOBcqMWKsYL9WNgZ0YUUxmLo2/5LfUT5Tl/8V4PyNZ8uItczHx34 Uknw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWBhryH0inCeksm78youeAGmZUeop3/eGs9bTzX69aw7qZkJcnW Em1Q+F2oJlwZOfky/uiq2AzYRfw8F2g9egk/xXU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/afNMOZUwqfV/4xMeHuxUQ1h4UTUzYrZYpsITULLbfbc7wOuMIn/D2zsKq2U4bZ2/OtbRWRAN/Wk7KuAfczSU=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5192:0:b0:4db:1999:67a3 with SMTP id u18-20020ac25192000000b004db199967a3mr617577lfi.13.1678793362977; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <167109992762.47874.10079369281284295973@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <167109992762.47874.10079369281284295973@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:29:10 +0900
Message-ID: <CACt2foFG373pz=uWCJCMeB0K9Epdj+vTAOfDHUAr2K758+8zCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases@ietf.org, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org, shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d38de05f6da8a3a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/Diz4hmD5s_X4XiRwv46rP34Xxhk>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:29:30 -0000

Dear  Zaheduzzaman Sarker.

Thanks for your valuable comments and sorry for the late response.

To resolve your comments, I updated the draft.

Please, find inline responses.

And, I submitted the revision draft based on your comments.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-15.html

It is appreciated to check again and let me know any missing points.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.

2022년 12월 15일 (목) 오후 7:25, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org>님이 작성:

> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for working on this document. This was a good read for me.
>
> #Comments
>
>   - The comparison table in section 2.7 seems nice one, however, as there
> is no
>   description given on how to interpret  the  Low or Moderate, frequent or
>   infrequent. It kind of fails to provided the intended comparison. Like
> the
>   scale is not YES and NO which cloud be easily interpreted, but No, Low,
>   Moderate, High and perhaps Yes. If there is such scale already available
> in
>   RFC or other documents would be nice to provide references.
>
[Hong] Based on RFC 8578, I update the expression : No -> No, Low,
Moderate, High -> Yes


>
>   - There are terms used like 4G, LTE in this document, I don't think those
>   need to be that much of generation specific and could easily be replaces
> by
>   "cellular" unless we see an need to mention a particular cellular access
>   generation for some specific reasons.
>
[Hong] Replace 4G, LTE -> cellular

>
>   -
>
>
>
>