Re: [6lo] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 10 August 2015 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDE11B2AE9; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9W2LjxwMEpRD; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BE31AD0D6; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE66388124; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.jhuapl.edu (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B161368355; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Savolainen Teemu (Nokia-TECH/Tampere)" <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>, ext Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150805164921.18507.26819.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <207610dcc74445c3990b10bfd1c53dd4@NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <55C89C43.5000602@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:42:43 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <207610dcc74445c3990b10bfd1c53dd4@NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G7OrK8D7B5XfUicO4WVRV6UVcHTcJkNcs"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/F-toeMmtTyAu6DpF-FACZW0Cp48>
Cc: "draft-ietf-6lo-btle.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-btle.shepherd@ietf.org>, "6lo-chairs@ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-btle.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-btle.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-btle@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-btle@ietf.org>, "Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com" <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:42:37 -0000

Hi Teemu,
     I will add this as an RFC Editor's note unless you feel more
comfortable submitting a -18. Let me know.

Regards,
Brian

On 8/6/15 3:39 PM, Savolainen Teemu (Nokia-TECH/Tampere) wrote:
> Thank you very much Alissa for helping to improve this document and technology.
> 
> Your remaining improvement proposal below would indeed make the section 5 aligned with the section 3.2.2, so I don't see why we couldn't do that on the next update (latest at the RFC editor state, if no update is made before that).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Teemu
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] 
> Sent: 5. elokuuta 2015 19:49
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-btle@ietf.org; 6lo-chairs@ietf.org; Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com; draft-ietf-6lo-btle.ad@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6lo-btle.shepherd@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-btle/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for all of your efforts and candid engagement to get my DISCUSS points resolved. I have cleared the DISCUSS. I did notice one last edit that should probably get made so that Section 5 is consistent with the new text in Section 3.2.2, but will leave it to you to decide whether you want to make the change.
> 
> In Section 5:
> 
> OLD
> For non-link local
>    addresses implementations have a choice to support, for example,
>    [I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids], [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941],
>    [RFC5535], or [RFC7217].
> 
> NEW
> For non-link local
>    addresses, implementations are recommended not to embed
>    the Bluetooth device address in the IID by default and instead support, for example,
>    [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941],
>    [RFC5535], or [RFC7217].
> 
>