[6lo] 答复: IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?

"Liubing (Remy)" <remy.liubing@huawei.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <remy.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592DA3A0CD9 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9kk1SB0VGmC for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4053A0476 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 493056401B9EAF173F55 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:19:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.66) by lhreml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:19:28 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.41) by lhreml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:19:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.134]) by dggemm424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:19:22 +0800
From: "Liubing (Remy)" <remy.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?
Thread-Index: AQHWaVzBKhmR3Hyc+0eEnw5InzBOjqkqnSYA
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:19:23 +0000
Message-ID: <BB09947B5326FE42BA3918FA28765C2E013424C9@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <e2aefe7aa0bc7181524c6e376f9288d9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <e2aefe7aa0bc7181524c6e376f9288d9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.242.194]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/Gh5f7VQp0G26uLOmnKu37o-bYNI>
Subject: [6lo] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLTZsby1wbGMg?= =?gb2312?b?Pw==?=
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:19:34 -0000

Hello Carles,

I am not aware of any IPR in this draft.

Best regards,
Remy
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Carles Gomez Montenegro
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:10
收件人: 6lo@ietf.org
主题: [6lo] IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?

Dear authors of draft-ietf-6lo-plc,

As part of the preparation of the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-6lo-plc,
    I need to ask the following question:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?

(Recall that all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 need to be filed for the most updated version of the draft, which is -04 as of today.)

I need a response from each author of the draft.

Thank you in advance!

Cheers,

Carles

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo