IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 12 February 2019 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5744712867A; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:06:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=dkvQUs+i; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=A5Fbw+J1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5qY0E7zDk7l; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB8F12008A; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:06:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10067; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549980392; x=1551189992; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=SLWInlkN+GOIS4dyNOjS4y96hYzUrEAm1/GG9hDkXuc=; b=dkvQUs+is2fVwYhzTqePBF0OkbCL20fcC/1TcWhVj5Q3Qen6JTaCCRWm kz8HVoqaw5eb48ilSLNzzeO7tv3RveKjPO0XHR+WEOZTRfWhURXgAxd/w 7cOQxN7TccFjsnV3AdiKO6M1rN0l2bhb1QdrjtLeXw0BVmch+QDfQYTJZ s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:WCGLgB359/XY3CVosmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKGt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQEVH7MfTndTASF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APAACY0mJc/5JdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVAEBAQEBAQsBgQ0jUANndAQLJ4dLA494glePMoJvA4YDgRADVAsBASMJhEACg0UiNwYNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFSgEBAQQtEwEBNwEPAgEIDgMEAQEvMh0IAQEEAQ0FCIMdgR1MAxUBAgygYwKKFIIggngBAQWBNAKDTxiCCwMFjEMXgUA/gRABRoJMgldHAQEDgSY6JAeDDYImkB6TAwkChzaFUoVfgW2FS4soijOFP4wjAgQCBAUCDQEBBYFcIoFWcBWDJ4Icg26FFIU/coEojCgrgiABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,362,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="515025977"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2019 14:06:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1CE6Hgm009996 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:06:17 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:06:16 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:06:16 -0600
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:06:15 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=swoLUusR5IIHhMCB7XbpSH3Fif5UHrmRMrNsX/AXh44=; b=A5Fbw+J1Hcsr+25W5UAlcRZ7bs5yRpHkei07KiKrTSEHioEuztOtWw19XMG2FfB4nrucCx7XVGP5xZNoTlPxB0OFrn5ODoIyy/nw6NQ8g2GiVqoQZMJeim6N1cae4FYq5mVx85Xz0BVCV1BIDzJtuJ+CTqaCkHE28TjYdxR2At0=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB3583.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.251.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1601.17; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:06:14 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e5c9:c60e:5e0a:415d]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e5c9:c60e:5e0a:415d%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1601.023; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:06:14 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Gabriel Montenegro <g.e.montenegro@hotmail.com>, lo <6lo@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org>, "samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com" <samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com>
Thread-Topic: WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04
Thread-Index: AdSuIYgabsqcvnWaQDSPCiP0NDhXfAUstlFA
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:05:48 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:05:15 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3565AC2D14003CAAC8F55C3ED8650@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <YTOPR0101MB16735C399C58C50856607A79C1830@YTOPR0101MB1673.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <YTOPR0101MB16735C399C58C50856607A79C1830@YTOPR0101MB1673.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1008::130]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d421c8ae-5b7d-46e4-3c37-08d690f34040
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3583;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3583:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MN2PR11MB3583; 23: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB358317078A399E35E0D8E5CDD8650@MN2PR11MB3583.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0946DC87A1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(46003)(25786009)(105586002)(6306002)(236005)(54896002)(68736007)(106356001)(9686003)(966005)(14454004)(186003)(478600001)(6246003)(4326008)(14444005)(790700001)(102836004)(256004)(6506007)(53546011)(6666004)(6116002)(33656002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(316002)(54906003)(446003)(86362001)(81166006)(8676002)(97736004)(55016002)(2906002)(110136005)(8936002)(74316002)(81156014)(606006)(7696005)(53936002)(76176011)(7736002)(476003)(99286004)(229853002)(6436002)(11346002)(486006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3583; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: WLe/JcBOxVqZot5saI1wxhvUxcb+LqpIrRZDn1JbA+rYOjJLNN1hnZU+iHFQOTZZ9YBe/2XIcsu5PaAErMF1eHr/7zC+a4ZTAkbyynPDCAlNC4c3tV4K50nJbWIPE3yf7KQjlik+xPs0AZA5DvJM/8NhmtsgM3lVxAtZnDw39sBvB67s2t2mWnS+fwSjELWXMJtJF4+lj324+RpKj+0gIt/JZNpisV1hvxdjgN7FzWDjAUjFQieaQsz7Jof62EPg8t8IqdIfzXjOaC0sPtk3fj0rvJxqmScNJyzpFPrKJW4+F6n5vQv3kMqNlbGyaLotUr+yqXsBzhWbG2G4Vr7deJ8/YlBc73isUciRPmJ+EhK2W7GoFTkgl8tJz9I/gjLYiMkOHSjpAonQkCbz6jlY3DmaASHVziIkXfiF1I5XOgc=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB3565AC2D14003CAAC8F55C3ED8650MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d421c8ae-5b7d-46e4-3c37-08d690f34040
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Feb 2019 14:06:14.7246 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3583
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/HJpslVuIxqFZIWIhaAzWFwdDH8c>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:06:35 -0000

Dear all

Sorry for being late. I support the publication of this document at  this time.
Minor comments;

Section 3.2.2:  RFC 8505 updates RFC 6775 and should be referenced instead for the DAD operation and the formats being used, which are modified.


  *   With RFC 8505 link local addresses are not registered, which is exactly what you want here, no need to specify it.
  *   The EUI-64 field is now called ROVR. It is



You may think about recommending an optional support for AP-ND (draft-ietf-6lo-<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-08>ap-nd-08<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-08>)as well, this provides address security I the mesh.

All the best,

Pascal

From: 6lo <6lo-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Gabriel Montenegro
Sent: jeudi 17 janvier 2019 06:00
To: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org; samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com
Subject: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

I'm initiating WG last call on:

              IPv6 Mesh over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy using IPSP
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

This last call will be over on Wednesday January 30.

This draft was dormant for some time awaiting implementation experience. That went well and validated the spec, but it is especially important for the WG to get some new reviews on this document.

Please express your view (even if it's just "it looks fine") on this document.

Thanks,

Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email