Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05: (with COMMENT)

Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Tue, 09 July 2019 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599DE120337; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=earthlink.net; domainkeys=pass (2048-bit key) header.from=charles.perkins@earthlink.net header.d=earthlink.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fDWM7Shjha5X; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D6412030F; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; s=dk12062016; t=1562638224; bh=eSNrGz9vTpOeXlKtjMKxa5vMbvc2rS6wErX0 6pPFfkI=; h=Received:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace: X-Originating-IP; b=Ty9V5lHCtvJF8AFhc4lphIjfigx204Ukvv41Ta5bZnWrEO wkuTyjV5xS4IuTUFXwmj8C2Hc7VgR1hp5OrdCVo/v1ccszOwhFajIir0PWuVzGgtLqL HRNOOltXzcMiulP5Zpdzt8Sqwwrup4WCYpsXIb15uTcGA9cvk5DfXQmCbTluV31EARX 9Oh76kajdtCs1d53mHlVaig7JkGa6UpdQesy1YvrLon8IusaUXuVa8bTSdt3WuGGifm f9YEGTgHyCKj5AX2VRhSXIk91oEraB7pQiR5UCn8tTh+4OIP9uroiQwkPLyFSYYQjb6 ZZ+EElWwpuvMx69/t6Vuf/2v/jZQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk12062016; d=earthlink.net; b=WV92m52W/3kyJCETIat+3Db3zxl4AlaSHJGb/CmzGXFmQv3UaDnagJLZhaJepbqa68tUNpsYxs2mQ7e9hsbyjMntD5Zk70aZzNJv8dHCbuKU/E57xoPWNYODJ6MawAIXpUN5Eju7RSlj4JKUFoBInHjNLwui0te/Oc6+uDRWDBG6g0HtHv7UoDMlhK3subUcxlVzE/vlxk58WwHfnCW6lhQ8A6DRIDQlFQHamWTeMjehXljdaLjpfyDIviGb4ZLfWqMhoU+c8tnWhxdUbIh9AXgazigE4Ki7uXruvSQn+iy/kQU/Fdc8L68qkPyHE/CxVspQt5XjsYmS09bJlyDDjA==; h=Received:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [99.51.72.196] (helo=[192.168.1.82]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1hkfaJ-000GGp-9S; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:10:23 -0400
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>, Shwetha Bhandari <shwethab@cisco.com>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org
References: <156263785090.1025.11300358419204649150.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <55603799-cf79-ce5c-18d2-d4a25f2bfc95@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:10:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156263785090.1025.11300358419204649150.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956846b590522b13c9564047f26cd485a6e0496bdb2dc66e1d7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.51.72.196
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/K-b-1nlo-u7XnWwHtHvouDGSLkk>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 02:10:40 -0000

Hello Barry,

I will make the editorial updates as suggested -- sorry I missed them 
this time.

I think that DTL should be able to count to 16, and it would be nice for 
it to fit in 4 bits.  For this reason, I hope it will be O.K to maintain 
the definition of DTL as it is.

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 7/8/2019 7:04 PM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The changes to the Security Considerations on version -05 address my concern
> about abuse of the deadline time.  Thanks for that, and I'm clearing my DISCUSS
> now.
>
> Editorial comments that are still relevant in version -05:
>
> In the Introduction, please expand “BLE” on first use.
>
> In “Terminology”, you’re citing RFC 8174, but not using the new BCP 14
> boilerplate from there.  Please copy/paste the new boilerplate.
>
> — Section 5 —
>
> Why is DTL the length *minus 1*?  Doesn’t that invite mistakes?  Is there a
> reason not to make it the length, and to say that 0 is not a valid value?  Do
> you really need the extra size that the extra bit provides?
>
>
>