Re: [6lo] Thomas' review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05

Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> Thu, 20 July 2017 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA6131748; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQeRGckAvJnt; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E77D127866; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,382,1496095200"; d="scan'208,217";a="284153669"
Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 20 Jul 2017 07:32:22 +0200
Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x6so1724697ywd.1; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111dnltiQ2XhPqsLlgh6HPR7Weqqz28vrk9lK+ak33ac2nUnBL1t O3iDBfvJ9ItaeL6uKif4pk8y0nlJPQ==
X-Received: by 10.13.199.195 with SMTP id j186mr2289927ywd.41.1500528741118; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADJ9OA-HmBK481WhSV=UjsWzjJX4tgMFFnKd4XdqO0UuHdt2Kw@mail.gmail.com> <77d94c124ec846daa0ee0c78b2f6c922@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <77d94c124ec846daa0ee0c78b2f6c922@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:32:09 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADJ9OA8heHPe6VqDCEAuGY4-q0ad6guzMf-u4gTwJgvAJ_wrLg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA8heHPe6VqDCEAuGY4-q0ad6guzMf-u4gTwJgvAJ_wrLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e61ae96ff3f0554b91216"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/OWwocBCv-H1b5-kEOtwqIyOvT8I>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Thomas' review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:32:27 -0000

You're welcome! I agree that PDF is less than ideal, point taken.

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 23:54 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Thanks a bunch Thomas !
>
>
>
> I acted and posted 06
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-06
>
> Note that the pdf format is not easy to work with. I cannot readily use it
> to reply on the list, and copy paste from your comment does not seem to
> work/
>
>
>
> Take care;
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Watteyne
> *Sent:* mardi 18 juillet 2017 15:32
> *To:* 6lo@ietf.org; 6tisch@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [6lo] Thomas' review of
> draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I did a full review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05. PDF,
> with many comments, attached.
>
>
>
> I had reviewed -04 in March [1]. Overall, I believe the document is now
> much clearer. The format it proposes and the way it works is clearly
> understandable by an implementer such as myself. I very much like the fact
> that "discussion items" (rationale, requirements, etc) are pushed to
> appendices; they tend to confuse me if placed on top of the document.
>
>
>
> To summarize, I believe fragment forwarding is important to have in any
> 6LoWPAN network, and that the mechanism described in this draft solves it.
> Happy to discuss at the IETF99 6lo session this afternoon.
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/current/msg02340.html
>
>
>
> --
>
> _______________________________________
>
>
>
> Thomas Watteyne, PhD
>
> Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
>
> Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
>
> Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
>
> Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH
>
>
>
> www.thomaswatteyne.com
>
> _______________________________________
>
-- 
_______________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com
_______________________________________