[6lo] Fragmentation discussion for scope determination
Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 July 2017 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9CF1317D8 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdc_N1iVBRdv for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77334129B3A for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r125so3131499vkf.1 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sJAHsMDvhuULJqNVRxuIF4DT+D8o+Fe1fFxMPASd7n8=; b=GUiAB8QCSsy4ieED0OWongaG2tP/VXgwrk1VcOMsVHzQpPvMxUO1y8OG8jGZq/HaS1 MsZilVnuRHVasvs1PL93c4iyXsNpaZPGHYz4n/C2SaW8J2aHb7/RV4fzQbQ8d/6vLYl4 nXDtTeRytHUMXQfkYQjR0yQlDYHF6M4IwlEIzRAUj1+Ck+qkWu70bS6JxYiRJSaaaND/ TSR4OEeS98LY2X/5I32Y+L0Vvv0Hy6QUlRK/T0mw9GytSv1lP6NUGjDcEiya2lrh5pE6 L4lXVguhie9SgQBrRa3IzU+A0Y+finLGZtIbi8ESXRl7PEQydLj1ES8ei17ef9/XO/S9 gkOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sJAHsMDvhuULJqNVRxuIF4DT+D8o+Fe1fFxMPASd7n8=; b=AcPlf71dd8XvT7z4zUxkr7qDZsniMqIAfaimsdaVOO2Qwvf+py60iWKvPgt5xkHm/c qZ98CnmA0dBBg3HQM+a/LT/5c1KfKLkbxu46u+kgPfMCqLITVY4TemYiNq5FhfLbE9wa VnygFotTTS6hRgkWy3FqSNADoSNd8tVOKsqDqORafxu2VIIXvLb7wrGy/mVIEjiky0nN Rn4GKK/BJ/kQnnrwrcqjOgvaxMd26WkrTZ94dVDF+o/YIQsoMjzTcNA3JR/sN1Ff8fOv SLLqrKL+5aq6ufYy4LJyibNih2AP+vDuLFZdx1chkkvrmiCn3H7jOAN0xwPXQNHGVxdf 3mSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113aXFkW4w6XZOw7iHeSp3pviFFil7cv4sVUI/6Nua+GL3eUd0tW iY32rYL0ESu4XO12Lvf/ebLnLwZPug==
X-Received: by 10.31.37.200 with SMTP id l191mr36539vkl.46.1499810159399; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.167.207 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:55:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpcymx_rA=6-csmpgywWtG-kmfArHb6X-MviLJtuXYjWLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141581ac819c2055411c32f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/RBPxg-aqEs1uMEemmf1uzxg45tU>
Subject: [6lo] Fragmentation discussion for scope determination
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:56:02 -0000
Hi All: The 6lo chairs like to start a discussion on the 6lo fragmentation requirements and scope of work based on IETF98 interest in the WG about doing further work on fragmentation. We are soliciting input from the WG on your thoughts and experiences on possible 6lowpan fragmentation issue over constrained node networks(6lo) that we like to work on, in this group. Based on your input and prior discussions at last IETF (Pascal and Carles), the chairs will prepare a list of requirements to have a rough consensus what we should be solving in this workgroup. Best regards, -Samita and Gabriel
- [6lo] Fragmentation discussion for scope determin… Samita Chakrabarti