Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lo@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: 6lo@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBFA79AD94F for <6lo@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.688 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_EPI=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=sandelman.ca Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lK6VJt2xQZks for <6lo@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AC779AD85B for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114C18010; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id hi3eV71wq3tg; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1761067264; bh=lv9VdIT9z5H7WUnCd2exnGZlhwdUR9o9qVB2ZjEp/v4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=genLWT5QrSjgdjGFk+8sr3JosL6vFlL4P1Nd4C2Huu+w6dbUP+WM80Vnu5kfGdY/I UqVPAw19EuPucgRc2+Kxjv0mNZpGwejL91xyJoG5fjEHdCdk9p6Dw4LyZvowNTpM3A 0m0F+9t+poLyEhzstrRFJN4Jh8vpuZMP61qQuFjYO1mwrO2ld7m59LBW+Gv2/8c+gd 2S+QpVSVcKI3IdlYpPlqAKKg/C/CXfM1NMT/JjsoKInUV2qJEZMZ7jNi+29i3Ld0Pf 0xm1DIiRKWk1tiUZddIcayXr9MLGcxcXodl5cJvLhJdGm4gjrT5TfURfyyLlb6lcVD k6gtLwukShN+w== Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE9A1800E; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4611D1EA; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Kerry Lynn , 6lo@ietf.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Message-ID-Hash: UY24RLND2GYVAXTW5PM4WUUKFY6PPZH4 X-Message-ID-Hash: UY24RLND2GYVAXTW5PM4WUUKFY6PPZH4 X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-6lo.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5B6lo=5D_Re=3A_Fwd=3A_I-D_Action=3A_draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00?= =?utf-8?q?=2Etxt?= List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org> Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kerry Lynn wrote: > I have submitted this I-D in order to update RFC 8163 to reflect the name > change of the underlying MS/TP data link in the ASHRAE BACnet standard. I > have also updated references and incorporated the one errata that was > reported. Cool. > The differences mainly are to do with terminology, with the exception of > fixing the errata. It may be the case that there's a better way to make the > requisite changes to the RFC but we can discuss this in the meeting. Please > let me know if you have any questions. Could this document go to Internet Standard? Maybe you want to name this rfc8163bis somewhere in the name? A trick/bug in the DT is that you can't easily diff against RFCs, but you can diff against the last I-D: https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-08&doc_2=draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00&iddiff=1 I would prefer a 6lo-rfc8163bis-00 that was identical to the RFC, and then a -01 that has your changes. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmj3wQAACgkQgItw+93Q 3WUpDQgAt8TEKsmcEVa52tai37Y6XhHCbDwjUCmWUMQXKyw3xgHkKPESob5A+w9U VrO/4HFHf/+IUn5mQQwMuiLUwRM9MhWfmnv+H0R0MeXqXRmgpjTCR1nD1Aip4nBj VQTyqVFKVg2IRq45uMgTZwDEV7J/vYeT5RfurEuUTqlalbPqpD2uAdPcOwZBno6g fHkshkxYmzWxGreFT+IKnfNwN7ND7f1bzEtcY0L+e/fBmslVfayRHExiRVb296V/ 18GSyVaPrbLN+It4iQocaCEt4ogsxJ1AibM7NgxMkt0ZBkdke2/rUVKCM33jRuMJ uIj6ZOXlB5VzRUW/vLX4Tz/oY65z9Q== =PTsH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--