[6lo] Review Request for ipv6-over-nfc-07

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1709A12E04D; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nyna8KpqJvWN; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBB312EB05; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p85so74523407vkd.3; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q/QH5jRf6z14FMSucNCn0+L3yzP+CWbEhekH5xPnhGc=; b=VQYSiACrNVx2OOnt9AL5R+J4I3UkQlHT/zyLMQBoMJDkInveo2fJor9ce2PX31wmUi aHmYFBmPZ05TYVoQ0o7ALMeQdqc2isqvN/Mc/3ivrutB24KKwm9Zlp6kQXeqR6Em7im7 w4KzF+4VUbhWUfkX1mPji1aPmJA9/4dP/yEbZd4XdUCESfABuj+FOYi2BE6DCj8XVwfa ZPdzXabdAj2cp50SNBzrHfX0KBgS3aAuW/kny38rR8SIe/2yxWWkcA7LqOYVUa7bONFe yun4fYLGB99CU/Tu9WpatGtMCkSOgFwlJp4oiHKDycnPxUm90ea77tByP6sIwIXFJS5I hGGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q/QH5jRf6z14FMSucNCn0+L3yzP+CWbEhekH5xPnhGc=; b=kuj+SO8/Vzxdvv4wG6afY/6bcwWhDS+Vs+vNdwmhuo0FDME8PK03N6zu9jGHHxp1tl l6pf+EXkJzWvUBnvL+TMfWkTUHOVJBL0NuVPoaBtV6Ai4HTs9vwTvrMeKtlm6D2PAKbA AXy1ajpUCWOpCZTAYd87Uoi4lbwMj4w9y4cOaedXriwhaXdTydLx6OBqjMllbqv8Jg5g rPA/qPnG5Z285Pl8ty17wUZ7cSYfiWMIPLFB8iso/VxuHiertZzi5HBLcOeaX+DRiWAd /YoBI6M8zQOGwwNBqtSDLarRPIWmXv1haBRCEbLp5cdOhA3vR6elflnmTMGD1JT7QoRf i6Jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBhow76W2plFqW3MYI3pqHPuJDB7eiQlRq+U2qrONAQAAZNI3Kw vpTdkvbWW75KPitJfjr7deddvdydNg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id p133mr11512648vke.123.1496708146145; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:15:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpeUiiaixp1Dept0spes769jOJrYHVg4TCN1r1qPkDmA2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, =?UTF-8?B?7LWc7JiB7ZmY?= <yhc@etri.re.kr>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Cc: James Woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142d9926233ee05513f8519"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/WK-zVtigtTdBvfABy11Trarnb58>
Subject: [6lo] Review Request for ipv6-over-nfc-07
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:15:50 -0000

Hello Dave, Pascal, James and WG members:

ipv6-over-nfc-07 has just been published and the author mentions that he
had addressed the comments from Pascal and Dave.

 Pascal and Dave,  would you please have sometime to review version 07 to
check if your comments are addressed?

I have appended the excerpt from IETF98 meeting minutes for your reference.
This document is due for WG LC if  it looks okay.

James, you are shepherd for NFC draft -- please let us know if you are okay
with the document's next step.


As per IETF98 meeting minutes:

2 IPv6 over NFC                                    Younghwan Choi

  https://tools.ietf.org/wg/6lo/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-06 was presented by
Younghawn Choi on updates and
  discussed comments from WG and NFC forum. The draft was reviewed by NFC
forum, no more comments
  from NFC forum. The author likes to move to WGLC.

  Dave Thaler:IID generation changed as a result of previous meeting

  Pascal: Replacing 6 bit address with hashing function with fixed
parameters. Scanning is still
  easy. How is it different?
  YC: offset. Dave: offset should be random to add entropy, not predictable.
  Gabriel: offset may not be a right name. Nonce would be better.
  Samita: need reviewers before WGLC. Pascal, Dave, would you volunteer?
  Pascal will do the review and Dave agreed to review the final update.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: 최영환 <yhc@etri.re.kr>
Date: Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [6lo] Request for IETF99@Prague 6lo Agenda items
To: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>

Hello Samita,

I’ve submitted the new version of ipv6-over-nfc (-07). The document is
ready for review.


Best regards,

Younghwan Choi