[6lo] Thomas' review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05

Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> Tue, 18 July 2017 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3FE131473; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.4
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XgSOuGYMLiLZ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F143012EC51; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,378,1496095200"; d="pdf'?scan'208,217";a="231922811"
Received: from mail-yw0-f169.google.com ([]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 18 Jul 2017 15:32:50 +0200
Received: by mail-yw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y186so6107143ywc.1; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112VRyHKXyIfL/zgomCCded89ImpEa0ndv9IRA5C3G7KYkx9yMlz 1YEVeMoSJnOTN96Ff0uxHbIf1MAykw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id e132mr1128767ywh.153.1500384768928; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:32:27 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-HmBK481WhSV=UjsWzjJX4tgMFFnKd4XdqO0UuHdt2Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-HmBK481WhSV=UjsWzjJX4tgMFFnKd4XdqO0UuHdt2Kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="94eb2c146da62de5600554978d7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/YrZZlGUirzVGW1oBALltMFdsA-w>
Subject: [6lo] Thomas' review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:33:22 -0000


I did a full review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05. PDF, with
many comments, attached.

I had reviewed -04 in March [1]. Overall, I believe the document is now
much clearer. The format it proposes and the way it works is clearly
understandable by an implementer such as myself. I very much like the fact
that "discussion items" (rationale, requirements, etc) are pushed to
appendices; they tend to confuse me if placed on top of the document.

To summarize, I believe fragment forwarding is important to have in any
6LoWPAN network, and that the mechanism described in this draft solves it.
Happy to discuss at the IETF99 6lo session this afternoon.


[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/current/msg02340.html


Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH