Re: [6lo] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 08 December 2020 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7393A0C82; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 04:21:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=X7qu9Pnk; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=WT+G3RNg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQjWs3TMqETF; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 04:21:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF113A0C62; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 04:21:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7342; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1607430108; x=1608639708; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HQ3a/RHJG9KBqCF2LknvrmuW7haZzcVeFdGAPgSDRcI=; b=X7qu9Pnk1Ax9+jOgEQUOH9aVThzvnaYqKHpC/++f213GclDhSIqIyikQ OhSdx+9lIV1C4WoQgU/xAFqp0MSAeU7AY6GXPPrY5IMR4DDIi9D1TNrR9 BSHNu56OBCGJ5XK2oukYj0rXdPWx9wS7Tpv3JARCoStftaLA6Cm/1C+ze Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ASVhsVBBgjtlJVY9IxV1gUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw31g3EW5nW77RZk+GQvqz9CiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFx?= =?us-ascii?q?oIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNFDUvnC2qyMKEV?= =?us-ascii?q?PyORcmbujwE5TZ2sKw0e368pbPYgJO0Ty6Z746LBi/oQjL8McMho43IacqwR?= =?us-ascii?q?yPqXxNKOk=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CvCQCfbs9f/5hdJa1iDhABAQsSDEC?= =?us-ascii?q?DIVEHdVsvLgqENINIA41bA5kJglMDVAsBAQENAQEYCwoCBAEBhEoCF4FnAiU?= =?us-ascii?q?4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcwEBAwEBARAREQwBASwLAQ8CAQYCFAY?= =?us-ascii?q?CJgICAiULFRACBA4FIoMEAYJVAw4gAQ6QOJBrAoE8iGl2gTKDBAEBBYEzAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?Cg3gYghAJgQ4qgnOCZhI8QoZYG4IAgRABJxyCVT6CUgsBAQIBFoEDQ4MXM4I?= =?us-ascii?q?sgVmBTgQYFxQOAQEhLgtEOAoEGgIECx4Kj08Ugyqjf4EGCoJ0iR6SIgMfgyO?= =?us-ascii?q?BLYh3hVePFp8FkUQghDMCBAIEBQIOAQEFgW0jgVdwFTsqAYI+CUcXAg1XjUq?= =?us-ascii?q?DcYUUhQRAdAI1AgYBCQEBAwl8il8BgRABAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,402,1599523200"; d="scan'208";a="746905375"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Dec 2020 12:21:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0B8CLkU0018522 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:21:46 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:21:46 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:21:46 -0600
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:21:46 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WcCauU6frAa0xDAzUg9zr/ZnGpSHmdmqhBOtRpGA5Un8ldQO9w3gpwlGv8J6du7PSkv7gfL6uG6iJdi2js/GYW6fle/iDgIBys6Rw6ARt9ZEjFvW6Pyd+u5NOltB2hU1NVYCKn5FbEl9Vxq/uxRxDdeMNcwrB3U/m9l/EOnZIwp1R9RuirXgAObcr+/mzs9nPbFqd1dLQQoRF7RsjfX1z8Zz4LKmYVYhGdItFCLc3YW65ScDj9Pkb39IgEvFW8ZdwClGzrGbrEOeebUoysJB59PrrWX2QI02pMVw3tnxaSqW6oAHG0MWe1/jbhm6GbZ2Kqg5xNIa8z/bznxNI4uN8Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HQ3a/RHJG9KBqCF2LknvrmuW7haZzcVeFdGAPgSDRcI=; b=e4/lZLh4Wx/9WeCmQ1tWrO8/DOqlyM3/Y3IVoiRBzbLpEGiY8COTjZv/G95JtZBvQmI66t9VqWZ0p49hsuCGV0LnrTNaTCoKj7ZsVjYpJTV2obQkp/9Jleo39hjjIh2XIlNUd8+ghuMaXuUpvTHIbcgVU2CUlSQ8bLqXTgLJg+/1tIqJ4WD601dXcpr/FD+CZqyFO+8kbeBItz1Tv0LvGChEgu4qEftvY7vFC6Gxndb3bUBa9YMLCXMSl6qpjmHaFdJ+WpwE1a+1zoCNro2J+2OWYVntnAdjy+JtQiWnXwEfXNm5lkv6NtefnJt6bYDyocRbetWuSfF+Mqo0QhlrVg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HQ3a/RHJG9KBqCF2LknvrmuW7haZzcVeFdGAPgSDRcI=; b=WT+G3RNgJOjRWKgMgC1y20r+IuzUgRQTzeDeHinlHkWJPYZA2S43/AQph9gSwnISNag+2brSPp05h0NHjwEqzqSKtYfeDZtbUxX773obx8vxLKb0Z1rpWOIT51r2cbD24cwAKSshHqA2n5xedjFbIv5DKVyQrjv88oUhz7/Ah2k=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BYAPR11MB3462.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:76::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.21; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:21:44 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::65a7:2fad:a960:2557]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::65a7:2fad:a960:2557%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3632.021; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:21:44 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh.all@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08
Thread-Index: AQHWzTv1nXqxE2+7N0yPcnFCPsfkSqnsyxUA
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:21:44 +0000
Message-ID: <7E3A807F-6C65-4F28-9FFD-68D3EDE67122@cisco.com>
References: <160416970565.21546.14455941867187000136@ietfa.amsl.com> <ad88403fc33476945d3685a56b8785e8.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ad88403fc33476945d3685a56b8785e8.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.43.20110804
authentication-results: entel.upc.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;entel.upc.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a00141a8-5eae-40b4-866e-08d89b73d392
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3462:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB34628042BAD4588A3F9A14DFC2CD0@BYAPR11MB3462.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: YqBfTZ5q8cRGwVUwf5PvLDFPvE2YTjMcko1jWIlAeRgnUO3tf58SetdhcNokR0lfnn34grNsA0+7E9h0n2e9Hjb+peDzwHXIl9Ys+6bpRXON9v6AcprdvcHputtW7zGk+Vo3Pw5ltnx/4GJqVghU6PfbWM56hrLe3s4NSYaJ2j4PkfU73pnFNn0+QPfMg4EIK1yxBKczZRkKOYxbvQN9BGy60mlsw5+gv0jmczHOkWvwv0vHSz7ZHvPngzD2up9DemNOZFip5TzlsZTC8nAcPUG6/Sq8c00xERw4VyIGnq6Af+JaqcIuiXBJBNcJ3VrD9mYuCaeBOF5xodbeK0Zs6XdqUIdgKM1Awy9csRS5qT9qlWSNlGBFLS6GB6eopWbexvtZVtV1qNQjSKmuOTQ9oGwNcrknXaHawHYWmlOda8piL2SGVSlbqI8+XXS5B4ikXGqMRolBJgK6oDkeMmTeWg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(6506007)(66574015)(86362001)(71200400001)(83380400001)(54906003)(36756003)(76116006)(4326008)(6916009)(966005)(186003)(33656002)(26005)(2616005)(64756008)(316002)(66476007)(66556008)(8936002)(2906002)(478600001)(5660300002)(6486002)(66946007)(6512007)(8676002)(66446008)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?utf-8?B?YnJBQmtVMlZkdkV0ZjVOS29oN1ZUV2hYczBoenpudzkrMEFKVVFOb1JiR0p0?= =?utf-8?B?R29EKzNQRVNzK2J2V2J0WXRQdkUvblhLQ0k2YzU1OGlwbjBMTVRtR3k3VVI4?= =?utf-8?B?S3Rzb2lxcStKQ1owVWxRWi9abUVBTjNEUk9jOC9jZ0FmazBHTko5MnBWalB4?= =?utf-8?B?c1dmcy8xaHZhV3V4UGQ2SGM1VFBzNjJWaFJKUFZVK1R2aUJ2L3hYV0VhcVdj?= =?utf-8?B?bm9yb2ZxU05kNkR1NXFZam9zdlUvUDBEZ1JTbkdOdjNhV21WdllUNklldFBx?= =?utf-8?B?eU52WitXQ0VqaEpvRmRETlFyNTErbnE2eDR2QnEyS0tZTzVvaU9FWG5lZUxu?= =?utf-8?B?TlBBd0VZMDhvMzJwNWhoUzRWMmFQNThQUjlIazBmaWZRcGFBZmRDUW1sMkRC?= =?utf-8?B?MWN3OWYrTkJBTVVmWFRXZEs1T3E2c3JlcmVFQVo4NWVURlVpUHFSblR2Wk5T?= =?utf-8?B?ZWJYUHd4YVV0cUd3aG83anc2Z2xITnE4SlpvZ0dSeTBuT3BJcWdPVXNYdWt2?= =?utf-8?B?MDhhbE1lZE5palV0dkJBVlZzOUZuK0FHd0hpSjFFYmVCemQ4N09vTTRoNm9B?= =?utf-8?B?WFRIdGw2Z2FVNHJ5SGg3SWxFb0pMbVhKQjJKY0x1V0JMTGNCdCt2bDYvUldN?= =?utf-8?B?SG5wTFVoM0JobUdBUFZsQzhjN0RVWVduMFNwMnNnZG5WYjEreWtMN295VzY5?= =?utf-8?B?eEIwQjhTTTBOYUVxcjZmUUlBaDBBOUo1aVRVcGRlbXhmZ3g4aDZVOWcvQkRG?= =?utf-8?B?MEEzTXovaFV0cVQxMDE2WWZMR0ZaMVVwVWNSNTVvb3RiaklmTkt1a3o3M1RY?= =?utf-8?B?V3Jaa2RRcTlHNEJQbWpXKzhDUTh0d3pjYmtveEVwUmIxSmF3WGRuRDk0dUVT?= =?utf-8?B?Q2NiWVduNG0vaTBCdEdtWFZZTFRleEoxL1IxbHRZaDdzbVRoa0lzQ2djVFYr?= =?utf-8?B?OVIxT05UUXJ6MmpUMElSSWVxUmgrcEo4eDYvWUcyNlpRbW1RSkJBVEJmSldZ?= =?utf-8?B?Q3ZtSjdCQUtQOXRWZWRrSTFJU2xkNFZsWmhRdDRmR1BGTlYwdXBjanR1OHh4?= =?utf-8?B?Rld0dk1ZVjJ2dzRzVTNoMTh4Y21sUWYvRy9PMEtzaHVRanp0WlFSSnJFZ3U1?= =?utf-8?B?cngzYm0weEhoUXVSeFE0eUVJVE52NmRSTUhsZEhQR0c5Z0toOE5zU1l2YTBq?= =?utf-8?B?VCtiUkErWjRPcGRZRjV5SCtXWHpDSXFiRGZTdEdFdk1COWlGOGtTM25ucVNJ?= =?utf-8?B?Yko0Z2RHTi9UUVV5MmZrdlBzRkVpaFp6ZFo0RTA0bS9yOXpHQ0RLT0RHTXdu?= =?utf-8?Q?DacU/N+nfHaNaUzFLQsvk2qyVWu0oIO5vE?=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4474671E3285B84CAD3F84580D662BAE@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a00141a8-5eae-40b4-866e-08d89b73d392
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Dec 2020 12:21:44.5285 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 8lxUfnU2YvYbEnz5lFbDZP/6d6XhIvCdTHEAAJEUD0J2klSzAPuW8LroJA+/PHkz
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3462
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/_QUYu5MVdUh99iG5_bYygfsK9QU>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:21:51 -0000

Hi Carles, 
The changes look good to me. Note that since my comments were nits, I had already marked the review completed.  
Thanks,
Acee

On 12/8/20, 3:27 AM, "Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> wrote:

    Hi Acee,

    Sorry for the late reply, and thanks a lot for your review of the draft!

    We just submitted -09, which aims at addressing the last round of review
    comments, including yours:
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09

    We believe that we incorporated your points below into the document.

    Should you have further comments, please do not hesitate to let us know.

    Cheers,

    Carles (on behalf of the authors)



    > Reviewer: Acee Lindem
    > Review result: Has Nits
    >
    > Hello,
    >
    > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
    > The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
    > drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
    > sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide
    > assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing
    > Directorate, please see ​
    >
    >   http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
    >
    > Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs,
    > it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other
    > IETF Early Review/Last Call  comments that you receive, and strive to
    > resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.
    >
    > Document: draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08.txt
    > Reviewer: Acee Lindem
    > Review Date: October 31st, 2020
    > IETF LC End Date:
    > Intended Status: Standards Track
    >
    > Summary: This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits
    > that should be considered prior to publication.
    >
    > Comments:
    >
    > The document extends the 6LoWPAN mechanisms to Bluetooth mesh network.
    > The document is well written and didn't and fairly easy to read given the
    > subject matter. Since I had not followed this standard previously, a
    > rudimentary understanding of RFC 7668. Additionally, familiarity with
    > RFC 6282 mechanisms is required to understand the header compression
    > extensions. My Routing Directorate review was primary from the routing
    > perspective.
    >
    > Major Issues: None
    >
    > Minor Issues: None
    >
    > Nits:
    >
    >    In section 3.2, it would be better to reference route-over in RFC 6775
    > in
    >    the first paragraph as it is essential to the viability of the subnet
    >    model.
    >
    >    Define or Expand acronyms in figure 1 before using.
    >
    > Editorial suggestions:
    >
    > ACEE-M-3B86:Desktop acee$ diff draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08.txt.orig
    > draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-08.txt 153c153 <    subsequent Bluetooth versions
    > (e.g.
    > Bluetooth 4.2 [BTCorev4.2] or
    > ---
    >>    subsequent Bluetooth versions (e.g.,  Bluetooth 4.2 [BTCorev4.2] or
    > 199,202c199,202
    > <        -  - +-------------------------------------------------+- - - HCI
    > <             |               Bluetooth LE Link Layer           |
    > <             +-------------------------------------------------+
    > <             |                Bluetooth LE Physical            |
    > ---
    >> Host   -  - +-------------------------------------------------+- - -
    >> Controllor  |               Bluetooth LE Link Layer           |
    >> Interface   +-------------------------------------------------+
    >> (HCI)       |                Bluetooth LE Physical            |
    > 293c293
    > <    6LN, 6LR and 6LBR IPv6 addresses in an IPv6 mesh over Bluetooth LE
    > ---
    >>    6LN, 6LR, and 6LBR IPv6 addresses in an IPv6 mesh over Bluetooth LE
    > 296c296
    > <    Multihop DAD functionality as defined in section 8.2 of RFC 6775 and
    > ---
    >>    Multihop Dupicate Address Detection (DAD) functionality as defined in
    > section 8.2 of RFC 6775 and 317c317 <    (e.g. very short-lived
    > connections) it
    > may not be worthwhile for a
    > ---
    >>    (e.g., very short-lived connections) it may not be worthwhile for a
    > 331c331
    > <    Bluetooth device address using the same compression context, the
    > ---
    >>    the Bluetooth device address using the same compression context, the
    > 342c342
    > <    Advertisements the Bluetooth LE hosts MUST, respectively, follow
    > ---
    >>    Advertisements, the Bluetooth LE hosts MUST, respectively, follow
    > 440c440
    > <    if the node is battery powered.  A router (i.e. a 6LR or a 6LBR) MUST
    > ---
    >>    if the node is battery powered.  A router (i.e., a 6LR or a 6LBR)
    >> MUST
    > 443c443
    > <    listeners for multicast groups the packets belong to.
    > ---
    >>    listeners for multicast groups to which the multicast packets
    >> destined.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > 6lo mailing list
    > 6lo@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
    >