Re: [6lo] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: (with COMMENT)

["Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Carles,

Thanks for accommodating my comments, and for confirming.

Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 22 April 2021 11:46
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>
> Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [6lo] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-
> 09: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> Thank you very much for your feedback, and apologies for the late
> response.
> 
> We just published an updated version of the draft (revision -10).
> 
> Please find below our inline responses to your comments:
> 
> 
> > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this document.
> >
> > A couple of minor comments relating to the diagram in 3.2 (figure 2):
> >
> > (1) It wasn't clear to me why the top left node was a 6LR rather than a
> > 6LN.
> > If this is deliberate, it might be worth a sentence to explain the
> purpose
> > here.
> 
> This was actually deliberate, to show that such scenario may occur and it
> is supported.
> 
> As per your suggestion, we added a sentence in the paragraph after Figure
> 2, as follows:
> 
> NEW:
>    Note that, in some scenarios, and/or for some time intervals, a 6LR may
>    remain at the edge of the network (e.g. the top left node in Figure 2).
>    This may happen when a 6LR has no neighboring 6LNs.
> 
> > (2) I initially found the bubble around the v6 Mesh to be confusing
> > - I
> > thought that it means that all the nodes are interconnected.  I'm not
> sure
> > whether the bubble really helps the diagram, and probably could be
> > removed, of
> > if it is kept, I would suggest adding more space between the bubble line
> > and
> > the mesh network inside so that the bubble line isn't confused as
> > representing
> > links between the nodes.
> 
> As per your suggestion, we removed the bubble for greater clarity.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carles (on behalf of the authors)
> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lo mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
> >
>