IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

최영환 <yhc@etri.re.kr> Fri, 25 January 2019 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <yhc@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6909812D4ED for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:12:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJcjboeB1Ese for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1CF1200D7 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:12:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO smtpeg.etri.re.kr) (129.254.27.141) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2019 16:12:09 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 129.254.27.141
X-Original-MAILFROM: yhc@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org, samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com, g.e.montenegro@hotmail.com, 6lo@ietf.org
Received: from SMTP1.etri.info (129.254.28.71) by SMTPEG1.etri.info (129.254.27.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:12:14 +0900
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info ([169.254.2.128]) by SMTP1.etri.info ([10.2.6.30]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:12:09 +0900
From: 최영환 <yhc@etri.re.kr>
To: Gabriel Montenegro <g.e.montenegro@hotmail.com>, lo <6lo@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org>, "samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com" <samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com>
Thread-Topic: WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04
Thread-Index: AdSuIYgabsqcvnWaQDSPCiP0NDhXfAGW5Q6w
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:12:09 +0000
Message-ID: <B2C0C4C29044814AB285BBB7C754D9249AC27199@SMTP2.etri.info>
References: <YTOPR0101MB16735C399C58C50856607A79C1830@YTOPR0101MB1673.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <YTOPR0101MB16735C399C58C50856607A79C1830@YTOPR0101MB1673.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.254.170.124]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B2C0C4C29044814AB285BBB7C754D9249AC27199SMTP2etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/ar1wX-K3UMsRbqTEO21S8f10hgc>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:12:18 -0000

Dear all,

I’ve read the draft (-04), and it looks fine for me. :)

BRs,
Younghwan

From: 6lo <6lo-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Gabriel Montenegro
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 2:00 PM
To: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh@ietf.org; samita.chakrabarti@verizon.com
Subject: [6lo] WG last call on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

I’m initiating WG last call on:

              IPv6 Mesh over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy using IPSP
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-04

This last call will be over on Wednesday January 30.

This draft was dormant for some time awaiting implementation experience. That went well and validated the spec, but it is especially important for the WG to get some new reviews on this document.

Please express your view (even if it’s just “it looks fine”) on this document.

Thanks,

Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email