IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] rgding 6775-update/EARO

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CAD131DAA for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xnjmv7v4jULQ for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7D4131D2E for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1500479485; x=1501689085; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=M7vb1NkwngQwBDH72GSHH0ISF8Ijm1xlsDNlgnY/sck=; b=FLKe3pGQzjScAFQAsKdCIiapDsAqU2IjHBwYtZjeY4L+jfyLx2ohzDP+ GsJ6H8c/gB9Z3WPBTRFkYl9J0w9ftCsvImdKHFZUWiyXuK+r8nvbfdZFg EdEIR1ihUkRwE2Tu9yrwoCOFrdvolytdKta9q6lmTzWYR2d8nMOKqQVgH Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D6AAC2fm9Z/49dJa1bGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9rZIEUB44EkWB0j2SFLIIRhUcCGoNGPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMjClwCAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIwFAkIAgQBEgiJQ2S0b4IminYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdhnWBYYJwNIUggl2CYQWXRId1ApQOghWQJIlHjBQBHziBCnUVSYUTHIFndogTgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,381,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="458055727"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jul 2017 15:51:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6JFpOQl027246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:51:25 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:51:24 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:51:24 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>, lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] rgding 6775-update/EARO
Thread-Index: AQHTAJpuIReQXGcTwk2GqQcsGeWFv6JbSw8A
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:51:15 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:50:26 +0000
Message-ID: <ac35daddafcb4af19bd706e36c6b711a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAO0Djp3w=4Gz6Dthh7DsEGGHvu_Tha0CLav1_vRqk1169VsB1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO0Djp3w=4Gz6Dthh7DsEGGHvu_Tha0CLav1_vRqk1169VsB1A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.230.140]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ac35daddafcb4af19bd706e36c6b711aXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/bYXMTuiDm3qjVrMpcjr94J7YAR8>
Subject: Re: [6lo] rgding 6775-update/EARO
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:51:38 -0000

Hello Rahul :

You are right, all this went down the sink with the RPL reference to the path lifetime operation.

I’ll add text extracted from RPL to explain the TID behvoour and make the specification self-contained as discussed at the WG meeting, unless someone shows up now on the list arguing we should do otherwise.

Thanks for the heads up!

Take care,

Pascal

From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Jadhav
Sent: mercredi 19 juillet 2017 16:22
To: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: [6lo] rgding 6775-update/EARO

Hello Pascal,

This is the same query as what i raised during the 6lo session. Like it was pointed out, better to take it on ML.

The new mechanism described in the draft allows a proxy registration on behalf of the "target node" using EARO.
My question is: Will de-registration be possible for such targets, especially considering that state information (in the form of TID) is maintained for such registrations?
It will be helpful to clarify in the document.

Thanks,
Rahul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email