IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF091243F3; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wstOfO_NusJp; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x234.google.com (mail-yb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A89D126C26; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e3-v6so9974900ybk.1; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hiZbiSL71UbLOPjEBGCNHLRmu097ZcWCm0rvldixFp4=; b=CA/zLo6WuTZXSlWfP2e37/Mkz8J8BxL5ozMLt9wNEynqunDraBRPRUo3GmDSvpXKgJ FaPH+b3EM8eax3l181VzLCTezu2i4qc5naFh1ZXgULPIuRoA+nabKA71N+2RJ6oqv+vD hrC92uQAEu87F+1tKA8KiVQ98B+FZaOgU1yAeqwsq18JgNHlAQnDPnCPrSuT+ysze+qs a+Z2rwm3WWRN2lo69iTv6FL9WH5IU6EQdcdHicg6fvni0/JQnPk4rxNqCGqd2fScKjoQ LSFqhlR3VhI8v8pqHOSBZ8M/hRtqmSCBjW09/kyrXq7JEQ9XFcDOOpy7T8mLFLJ73TwD jkQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hiZbiSL71UbLOPjEBGCNHLRmu097ZcWCm0rvldixFp4=; b=LYUEpamAV9mD8jxObqC4aL1MORPrE0fv7DagPinNpfp9pXtI3yi2COjdDFFLr6Xdwj rn1I7iN7z9bi0cJVmH2Y3l5PZXs80CLwBJsw6vMOHEjtroFY5fDLFNL5bCIbV68muk+O XkTlStOiOPpSQcVjLVvoxD834N9S0AGyBFQb23VzYdxEiS6Ew6zPI/syNJWBZVm5Zkz+ Y5M17i2sAxoZX1OiJXOL9CDXZnr3vdadFypAxKpHwWL1WW+gwzN7iGzMIi3AcD8118RO m0wzr5ER4wVqqWd2067qnVz+nC6flRLAKAYWoZRD95JIpa3xYv4aMGG2AcXEs7UJ8DJS RS2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDRZfcYMC3B9Vo1wF4wJ0fTRXc73C4fHmEeAZbYCqA+GivUoRE3 IFs5x6+bq8Almvp9mjtKVYNeA+uB5Bk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/GmpbRKZIfhtbpQKNEmvRWxp0eEtbe3iN0vH8ojyZaUPROz/or6nJREBsODMBQG38w5EAvmg==
X-Received: by 10.129.179.4 with SMTP id r4mr3489935ywh.85.1522905867391; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.10] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c83sm1970591ywh.10.2018.04.04.22.24.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Apr 2018 22:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7604C322-AEC9-4A0A-953E-4FE7188249D0@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 01:24:14 -0400
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6lo-chairs@ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org>, "dthaler@microsoft.com" <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F338E273-8C3D-498B-B14C-00ED8FE429A7@gmail.com>
References: <152280747362.24073.12482880754689636320.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CB38E612-AFD4-44E4-AB0A-1AE4F58553DE@cisco.com> <7604C322-AEC9-4A0A-953E-4FE7188249D0@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/bcqhZR6YIcZ1x83g6r88DneNjxc>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 05:24:31 -0000

> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 1:23 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Ben;
>> 
>> The down reference issues were added as part of the IESG review; the refs were informative before but it was pointed that since they were referenced in the terminology this made them normative. CC’ing Adrian.
>> 
>> Can we live with it?
>> 
> 
> Theoretically any normative downrefs should have been mentioned in the IETF last call announcement. Since these were added after LC, it’s up to Suresh to decide whether the LC needs to be repeated. (I don’t necessarily think it does; I’m just pointing out the fact that they exist.)

Thanks Ben. I am torn as well. I personally don’t think the terminology related references have to be normative as someone does not need to read the whole referenced (terminology related) document to understand and implement this one. Adrian, your thoughts?

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email