[6lo] draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery: Send a FULL bitmap when datagram is complete?

Martine Lenders <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de> Tue, 01 October 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6352120130 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDshhUCTNHqu for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5153D120098 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for 6lo@ietf.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de>) id <1iFJBn-001Evl-NO>; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:31:43 +0200
Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com ([]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for 6lo@ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (envelope-from <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de>) id <1iFJBn-003KA6-A6>; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:31:43 +0200
Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id i16so14591071oie.4 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXguiop1+6s8vvCpkYwkFe/qXkCSR8cZLF0xDR2ZM+T/TVd1H70 lEYDyhI9oWDb1KuQrbnpEo8/liD7KWam0r/9aXw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/ILOqPJBi/DNIHN/A8Tx05zjQ10CzYReC8yXEidrtlGMhyZF0FtWSdpDAlQJchG4HoX06/dlt5kkjHz/aAUo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b583:: with SMTP id e125mr4077221oif.2.1569940302153; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martine Lenders <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:31:05 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CALHmdRy60adS4rkdzgu4b8aBvEVWPk2tN=1ppXcbJNzfuZQg-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALHmdRy60adS4rkdzgu4b8aBvEVWPk2tN=1ppXcbJNzfuZQg-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000751900593da3649"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/cRpB9nqkGxisk3Ccr7Y8umprS6g>
Subject: [6lo] draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery: Send a FULL bitmap when datagram is complete?
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:31:48 -0000


draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery states in section 6.3

[the] might need to abort the process of a fragmented packet for internal
> reasons, for instance if it […] considers that this packet is already fully
> reassembled and passed to the upper layer. In that case, the receiver
> SHOULD indicate so to the sender with a NULL bitmap in a RFRAG
> Acknowledgment.

The given example seems to me the perfect instance to set a FULL bitmap
instead. There is no other instance were a FULL bitmap is specified to be
sent, except for the case that the datagram incidentally fills out the
whole value space of the sequence number field.

Or am I missing something?

Kind regards,