IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Tue, 28 February 2017 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68874129412; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.229, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8O9k6TwgfinV; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com (mail-ot0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114F5129409; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k4so18215979otc.0; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=KV7dOqoqvuBqCn4o2dsvL5Oj4IFYtDQoNCj0Kcusnpo=; b=R8lioaOHpVzxwJd7KkzbxEftI7uBQrNaxbCykjgfgkwcEevGWFF8lAVFWeKIwKHjAi unTZ7Bg5O1pcxqN6NyTaMSoBulHRPWBurrQrshL3hfpDuqE6LdoBe8CrcqT1zIJFSIrE 6gZQPqQslPW7QS4h2ajejvvPqiTDtt724YxC9hqqHaz5pP0YFjsEfYTiujY9l57QChZ1 TUsptDIPFfcF+QWMF5CXg9MmAUq3EDftm3cR0/6tBM714wPvV+qf3hzvcd86UneJdmyC g6ez2QoxhdcK2PwVR+7REF0swwf2d3ZHuxsCyM0JbVDGXsMaBx9uGS1RLE9azn73W/7V WbVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KV7dOqoqvuBqCn4o2dsvL5Oj4IFYtDQoNCj0Kcusnpo=; b=gcqrZS3H4tzdiaLdCMHdvp/CIxP+AhwU2v5qyL0qfyvHsC/QQn49l5oo0zufdswOut JvXzlWb1Ig4Sr0bkupcTAJuhSmIVV5cQsh/klsagtBdssUw0UtRoHQhkEQfExFbPIdHR QAuUmHNGY402q5YSxP4s6jaAPxeKFX+Z8Ukn4vbsDmq8EmQXoRd0HCEWtXsbjTVRpNex CmQThnkuJokWtSvVfPSQPsbOqfA/54J6ZkLW5ifwgaSES49/no5k6gkglX3azppGERsI oFnNxvNlaG4R+p6NTf8xxT336awfbmCvLg6VqQN+5DigzuFEKwekGFFgnhFjNAhF8NuB nkyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kzJAe0gLiMZwZujPDWJPXM96vCIRznLV76cmQrTJROrFNpwRfZIv52kUPCgJdT0crQjbC86jDLAqOazQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.27.154 with SMTP id z26mr2752987otd.181.1488322511474; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.217.38 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:55:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148046235620.11752.2233031007089619864.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148046235620.11752.2233031007089619864.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:55:11 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: RjK11plbJ99Gg4Jysz-rk1JLWZE
Message-ID: <CABOxzu1_bMjB1PBXbnVAYfVX5HuduDHiOeMUKViWRqy6fvSC_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e026c9b959b05499f16f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/d6f0pCtaSu1WbZpHQom4bknpQ0U>
Cc: 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac@ietf.org, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:55:13 -0000

Hi Alia,

Thanks for your review.  Comments inline...

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In Appendix B, given that there is code, it would be good to specifically
> mark it as such.  As I recall, there are different copyright aspects to
> the code fragments in an RFC than to the text.  I believe that
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/copyright.html  provides pointers to
> the implications and encourages marking the code segments with
> <CODE_BEGINS> and <CODE_ENDS>.
>
>
> Done.

Thanks again, Kerry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email