[6lo] Review request: draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Fri, 06 March 2020 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D2D3A07E7; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:56:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55oclnq8c2Wr; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674EC3A0C22; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 026Hu2e1064432; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:56:02 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41C1D53C1; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:56:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 10.192.137.220 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:56:02 +0100
Message-ID: <eac7e2887ecbfb496811696bffa743a9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:56:02 +0100
From: "Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Delayed for 56:15:43 by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:56:02 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/joR8qd3niHLJRAZpsH7dGZzvb-A>
Subject: [6lo] Review request: draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:56:07 -0000

Dear 6Lo WG,

The ROLL WG chairs have requested reviews (from the 6Lo WG) of a ROLL WG
document [1] that updates RFC 8505, one of the products of the 6Lo WG.

Is there anyone who would like to volunteer to review the document, in
particular, with a 6Lo perspective?

Thank you in advance!

Cheers,

Shwetha and Carles

[1] The document can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves/