Re: [6lo] AP-ND 22

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 27 April 2020 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0068F3A09EE; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79YUX1E2eBVu; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4879B3A09EF; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id k12so10880508wmj.3; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Vw4x90KQUHUZneg2o+NXQNrAiEcG8TY3YRSOPmLBxqY=; b=HQmtauX7kmhLCHLZ9YeFbWT5f4ZUlGtfyEp1ZZYaLbpvei2BkE1vDHD6Pn8LXAaDHn lXaBvuwwkBZCF7jdVsWuEvCzRdCSYq4PTXOiJmfRFyILXlq+NedFSoQlr9Ibao7YnS7d Tsihyr6flVQaQItJDuhfAnLTnf0jQ65F3xNjVVm1DW0oAANnwcamG1yafU0B9CHNS/uQ N4bwOtAn8ikPpcYwBB1AKT+NMf1PqOn7COYdRhN/yodhNRiNpw2Dje4O2sVyXKl9c2cz /GTVcAj06v6zMDgVrXP/y4VVRg0yG8L6gdZwvdJQ2uCOD8kpaOLV8PnDC+rCrZhhzGxd mpFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vw4x90KQUHUZneg2o+NXQNrAiEcG8TY3YRSOPmLBxqY=; b=l/w5iIdUyHBQnz+/uFQLtVgy8nHtBu4Dq4DaZWgowaxr2fT2E71nvfLAx1TH2+9DLE dfq84/ML7XwEdZC5WXzkiZ86ScN+1ekZKU0FeG/45k7ssX+kKio1viZfwX7LVOkjeBkC mmMqM9R5e0pH5LiBeGa4CNzfj799Gn2a/Pp70bn+7UHOb1K5tfrWk8aQo0Uk8pJj2MOT VVP1x5Pb6s+pAexdTEc5Rh7lM7rNxrwjBw4HIRIoXcr7mrNfvqxLpm1GriatCyKF6o2m 5u5ZPSYw4LhtyMhOFLQxmMi5aapTPqV6mAUiH0sH8EoStw4YcDvP8eFH20kVnxKnx4Fa 4Cow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubWBpOb3jikT8Fcc2x04CmIJp91M1Autf0IRNIoMz3Nva8YECWA KTW0eRCZ/wZGMCMvnvTVDUuQGgAUrpkgE8VTDtQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLQAjatUTG2F1jjnUCk7xg2NurkY8uxLyLzzvDJDcOGgsE+WDMBaZaZQ1220nX7DgjuX7W7OfTSra3Z2dI1hMc=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2b46:: with SMTP id r67mr3075357wmr.160.1587992928710; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB3565BD638A8BCEE57216998BD8D00@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CADnDZ8_0Bms-pGiGnAX6Cz496qhSOaCGNMggpg7fsQM5wn892w@mail.gmail.com> <20200427035234.GR27494@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20200427035234.GR27494@kduck.mit.edu>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:08:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_BxskZittSn4vmn+jR+c4bbrR0uBZLgTvxAnmRhFrVnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "6lo-chairs@ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@ietf.org>, Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>, "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006bf3c605a4456a59"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/kukvLZZFtcUib7VX70qnY8geons>
Subject: Re: [6lo] AP-ND 22
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:08:52 -0000

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:52 AM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:10:33AM +0200, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> >   The draft should indicated on top first page that it updates RFC6775,
> > 7400, and 8505, it only shows updating RFC8505.
>
> The 6775 case was discussed extensively during IESG Evaluation.
> Note that 8505 itself Updates 6775, and the changes in this document affect
> only what 8505 does (IIRC).


some new options added by this specification are discovery options and not
for registrations,

this draft says in the abstract that it updates 6775 and 8505, so if it is
in the abstract it is mostly updating in ietf-doc relations.

Best Regards
AB