Re: [6lo] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: (with COMMENT)

[Yong-Geun Hong <[e-mail]>]

Dear  Murray Kucherawy

Thanks for your valuable comments and sorry for the late response.

To resolve your comments, I updated the draft.

Please, find inline responses.

And, I submitted the revision draft based on your comments.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-15.html

It is appreciated to check again and let me know any missing points.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.

2022년 12월 15일 (목) 오후 5:12, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <
[e-mail]>님이 작성:

> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The GENART review was particularly well done.  Please give it its due
> attention.
>
> I concur with Alvaro on all of his points.  I feel like at a bare minimum,
> RFC
> 8200 should be a normative reference here.
>
[Hong] Move RFC 8200 and other RFCs into Normative section

>
> Please expand "OFDM" on first use and/or provide a reference.  I see Eric
> found
> a bunch of others; the authors might want to review all of your acronyms
> for
> proper resolution at or before first use.
>
[Hong] Add full name of OFDM