[6lo] 答复: IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?

"Houjianqiang (Derek)" <houjianqiang@huawei.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <houjianqiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2BB3A0F1C; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7deY-iJa7-rB; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A576B3A0E12; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml742-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EC00F6A23A94DEDFBE0F; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:34:11 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) by lhreml742-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:34:11 +0100
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) by dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:34:09 +0800
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:34:09 +0800
From: "Houjianqiang (Derek)" <houjianqiang@huawei.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-plc.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-plc.authors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?
Thread-Index: AQHWaab8CNMFWkFOTkCsjDSJ8+2P96kqofyw
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:34:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9b461951993049bda8e0abfb65ae7139@huawei.com>
References: <e2aefe7aa0bc7181524c6e376f9288d9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <e2aefe7aa0bc7181524c6e376f9288d9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.80.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/mmqFAh_uZYswnlIHMZy2LdWX_4Y>
Subject: [6lo] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLTZsby1wbGMg?= =?gb2312?b?Pw==?=
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:34:20 -0000

Hi Carles, 

As far as I know, there is no IPR that applies to the 6lo-plc draft.

Cheers,
Derek (Jianqiang Hou)


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Carles Gomez Montenegro [mailto:carlesgo@entel.upc.edu] 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:10
收件人: 6lo@ietf.org
主题: [6lo] IPR on draft-ietf-6lo-plc ?

Dear authors of draft-ietf-6lo-plc,

As part of the preparation of the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-6lo-plc,
    I need to ask the following question:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?

(Recall that all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 need to be filed for the most updated version of the draft, which is -04 as of today.)

I need a response from each author of the draft.

Thank you in advance!

Cheers,

Carles