[6lo] 6lowpan Fragmentation design team interest?

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35208131B20 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGtRu_5NaUDR for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com (mail-ua0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4215131474 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y47so14860933uag.0 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9CJ32LLdpczM6PeOXydXdXzAxjrqbO2PLQdjEgEqyhI=; b=RxmGwP/j+ddlae+Z31wSWIZ2aFFKL09fVDT7a6kObos1kcoLkXhMhSOhySeYhsnFZ4 aHsZ8W5/B+b1yPncUDzbnKHne7nOWpdADK68/c+mXsD9U6kS7KUtZKwfghLw6lNwvHYI U31JhSNIk+8et7eAJy+1FpPRs2pf3jnerJI01AAGKEvldhVkgNbYzF9jIIqJR5oCxhn1 8LUNv++ojmvpt5qNLJab30+tpVgRoh1MBBzTdkM+GeiwD0Rc4XmWfwJl0cpmpLKrkMTa Zr6DU7XiOp9riZUo07FRPdJkHlL/7Ux7IbgDFHJLvOqvUrEu4Bc1sS3GgzoloNCLEnIk d4+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9CJ32LLdpczM6PeOXydXdXzAxjrqbO2PLQdjEgEqyhI=; b=IkJqUxtsqb7Ir/dLaFTBBGDZsEBC8kdAYogIzJFIfKukxXxnmM9Z1pXV97hdyav2F7 ZEByMRFETFCDaGpkiHp6pxl0MJDBOoJMPNcOz4eRpzLKzCz5QbP1ZhuhpsbyL3HD59dT ye0M9ZVkplGIqWQMlLygX42vs/d3J/moddBQF9hsb5hBS5vSXFBnmQjrwDUzONcY4oBm sH/Te9EzWlStVJ+6y5GJTtFYMizKfJgnaNJeb5VeE7H5oKWTR1zydtx50B2qFfW9HVqd +idRyLvfY4cBEfoT99/DcP6/ka8XCuBJk+MXuJvkZcho6f4IqIJ2pIPSmvxlgDPl6gpE AJtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110sPaYc6FxiOdmWfgCfcDt0sNGxu7pIyPmsW7sh72yujTKanxBa 70GTgnYSkBVPATBqs9/4PTZ6VXpgVxc0
X-Received: by 10.176.9.75 with SMTP id c11mr1392487uah.145.1500395640677; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.167.207 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:34:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpcXJcWH3x2EE+FmM7sVJvo5ahpg-RHS5oyrdLsnA9Ck-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043ec1342f693a05549a15c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/oQv72MPqytP28MXz6Y2pajIOocQ>
Subject: [6lo] 6lowpan Fragmentation design team interest?
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:34:08 -0000

Dear all:

At IETF99 6lo wg meeting 6lo-chairs discussed a few questions in order to
sense WG interests for further work on fragmentation - especially for
route-over topology.
The details charter for the design team will be finalized soon.
However, the 6lo-chairs are collecting names for the interested individuals
for the design team. We might need 4-5 person design team and prior
experience on packet forwarding is helpful.

We are requesting the following :
* Send your ideas to the list on what you want to see resolved by the
fragmentation design team

* If you have any prior experience on 6lowpan fragmentation work on
router-over or mesh-under please send information about it

Thanks,
Gabriel & Samita

Reference slides from today's session:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-6lo-wg-discussion-questions-on-6lo-fragmentation-work-and-scoping-01.pdf

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-6lo-6lowpan-fragment-forwarding-in-route-over-multi-hop-topology-00.pdf