[6lo] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
Robert Sparks via Datatracker <firstname.lastname@example.org> Fri, 23 July 2021 18:42 UTC
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285673A126D; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <email@example.com>
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:42:19 -0700
Subject: [6lo] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 18:42:19 -0000
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is basically ready, but has nits that should be addressed before publication as Proposed Standard RFC. Context for the ADs, from my LC review: > This document's primary point is to standardize mappings of ipv6 identifiers for using ipv6 over IEEE 1901.1, 1901.2, and IT-T G.9903 networks. > Those standards are not publicy available, and I have not reviewed how these mappings and the security mechanisms in those protocols interact. My LC review suggested removing section 5 - Remy's response was that he would check with the WG. I don't find any discussion of that on the WG list? I still think it could be removed or moved to a separate document. My other comments have been addressed. This version introduces a few editorial nits that I will send directly to the editors.
- [6lo] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-pl… Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Re: [6lo] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6l… Liubing (Remy)