Re: [6lo] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 19 February 2020 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B73120810; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:27:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=zfSEgNQH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=i2B4cvrw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dg_BDZWsqPQT; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B48120639; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFD82FF; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:27:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:27:39 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=x KqKFrkV+1J0rwqGEU85OwQUisAeIrwofSvws9V12oM=; b=zfSEgNQHT/ww+tjNj L3P21fraqYqqPkOZ12pbG7P71aVUhhinXZ6jmJ2RoeDUGLPPkX/pPl8W2KL2hiad wp5kA6bo/C6khHHvN2E/zNeEafrB0J7k/OPORUojgirV7aF7BzGyKbhRvjgMlThv bobHzAqYQr2pRXnoyXF3fytsTeIsF5k3OMW7wAhIy0+MwHCPcCDlWuG9ED6wCd0h xZZ1kaMGeTmLtlIwgQ0fiMvmKglAY7pRphUExeAcrGtG5xM+uMCplFdmvnXeOh3P tTaWBwEavLva3PmX0dB8PnVwqoZi6O1qCEL0hWWlDRXmtsZAVGZkX4plnrZB+Ppv znqAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xKqKFrkV+1J0rwqGEU85OwQUisAeIrwofSvws9V12 oM=; b=i2B4cvrwzd3bTLQhXq09YYktAIkh3Px6GdXNhXHcrD2c3ekKBGCIjMXla eXVx8EP1lAsPxNX7pEWdk8GVrjbh8Yoi4LxMwM8BfqzvLFwjV8lE2S9yLWRwMCSN NVHhGaG5z0GeS5IU9GKvflL317uKReBp/Rh3+udm3IKdlZTLzxruySRDL8QvEtYE oDlvuTZkYMAPdLnuhPQ2vyWZuITFYVD06ROQTbwCTzNMZdInkYiy/QagELNBpIrN nWqjZZ15P5js7YmQFPO2ptULF5vf/dVcLvf7QktOPuX2HT8blVDUjsPz3RTNGqIz +FCC+EuaWW+INib/gkFJYcMAkQKMQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:OppNXgtBuNjeugWME_vdWPkSrzoIf6Pk7us-2IT4UDOHbfc_M6tguQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkedtgddufeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrkedvnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtoh hophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:OppNXiudBmBV7V-FI774aZ_iBoVKlkTBOkMXNsHnfAV9zy9HoD2gSQ> <xmx:OppNXtcsPdrNqucsGCOgzy4Xkefhu_60H9jhR00zR7Y50rZfhRcnOg> <xmx:OppNXrY30t55unXQDoGImXgi_vns2AnmkUkc2Ti4Hh97j6KqP0vqzQ> <xmx:O5pNXt64e5LbHgKie1x8JMpU_Xa8TbwlypG8vIOP7gkPOinUFt19dg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.82]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6ABD43060F09; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:27:38 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <A50F0D59-8F3A-4CD5-901B-1234CC3E3178@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:27:39 -0500
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A71DF720-6EC9-4BC0-9970-2EE396F56093@cooperw.in>
References: <158045285872.4392.15208767587942630222@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB3565309074805835A893E8D6D8070@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <A50F0D59-8F3A-4CD5-901B-1234CC3E3178@ericsson.com>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/rlXS16CQtd-lDYM80cxpKzc6bBc>
Subject: Re: [6lo] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:27:42 -0000

Francesca, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Best,
Alissa


> On Feb 3, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update!
> 
> Francesca
> 
> On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hello Francesca:
> 
>    Many thanks for your review : )
> 
> 
>> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the
>> normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan-
>> virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft is
>> on the standard track.
> 
>    Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway.
> 
>> 
>> Major issues: -
>> 
>> Minor issues: -
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity.
>> 
>> OLD:
>>   An associated
>>   caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
>>   fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
>>   a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment.
>> NEW:
>>   An associated
>>   caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
>>   fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
>>   a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node
>> A.
>> 
> 
>    Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? 
> 
> 
>    Again, many thanks, Francesca!
> 
>    Pascal
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art