Re: [6lo] ND cache entries creation on first-hop routers

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 03 July 2019 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001FF120695; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kSv3syNN5Rcb; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D9A120662; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id o13so1777634pgp.12; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fZWjYspQX44xnXTEIYKrD0yhxlZb/34/gZGPoI+SzIk=; b=V+T3oAXcRVLd6KKACu83Gl+9i1dZ32yghX2krt60HsVlt2RFJ+bAZDZctW1pj0mO/X JQ3xunU/GaxGbRqEFlEg5VN/yNS+7uZmkZGsrNkN/WYt7+t8eowYh76T2xp8YUDR3S4+ ffrQlTwZK8r4+MO6CB9UpG4F0ETwTloEC8/Pib28zB0PhN7rl4IehnajIkbGl+RC4slI b5nNvxn45M7dmV/BRxXQFlCg+f8ySMyDc0qkyhogJixQ5pT8yHlQ6vumBQaJ86TEZg7J TbQMu99OqXyqktRdRiyFyPut5cwTkRD5W90TfBcxHeL5aKuoemAazklOXAz0IZXY5c5P STQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fZWjYspQX44xnXTEIYKrD0yhxlZb/34/gZGPoI+SzIk=; b=ZYm9j2OVRz3MhakCsGpypfBhCateF+sA3BKDKlHZwGIRgkFg3ZbuR9x9PW1A2XOEsS pzZJIc7+Kzc/f5/Uq8SVNW3kM2x7Af+GC4QVnH4gAb0rXgL9Fnpt6jRZR5m6CZpUHG16 YwA7DoS9YhCYJCBeANu2oJhpU4UjpzEvo6N9RUH8NbWm8dcpX19KDZOc7rapYqSM8KUB gtwaStDRzo9ZnYrbNw4p9mx1wO2+lFnHMRZWsYkvTEIg2W7I1d0W8ruqjQul/q0mCqDm bHHCIO+70OKJqhMT2YzS1aEW9nmL9tikOaYAjDs+ZqTmpbL2SQNtPVYKxhdR4vIPCPmT rwYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgYmejJldTDt6T6+dzViZRjA2R3aqzYKrTsfJHgXNQbxuhSP2t sRUHeAm7jUo8rdUt1QESKBxvTnEj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwbfby7MsS1Ty0YZt21o7OY5qFgE9lV1qWpy1J1XYah0XEQDDabj0bxBCzT2iSdq78gAOmyEQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:205f:: with SMTP id r31mr30679080pgm.159.1562186321322; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (32.23.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.23.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 85sm3196094pfv.130.2019.07.03.13.38.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <CAFU7BAQ4xrjNn9-EUyRhyHKDDT=f381Z4T6x6qJ=ftm2D2K4cw@mail.gmail.com> <5377.1562081856@localhost> <MN2PR11MB35652B81658AF0E9F718CD52D8FB0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0e80ea5d-d659-2d3e-43ac-674531f171eb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:38:35 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35652B81658AF0E9F718CD52D8FB0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/s-_5N_BusXeat4S3bg27iXqChqA>
Subject: Re: [6lo] ND cache entries creation on first-hop routers
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:38:51 -0000

On 03-Jul-19 20:13, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:

...
> I'm baffled that the reactive ND is still the official technique for IPv6 lookup at 6MAN.

How can it be otherwise when a node can give itself a new address at any time without notice?

I'm not arguing with you about RFC 6775/8505 networks, but that doesn't apply everywhere.

    Brian