IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 13 November 2019 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5821200D5; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:49:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=V6rYmTt7; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=oJK5gcsb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXPrZCVmxRr1; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C775120041; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:49:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=20465; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1573616978; x=1574826578; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Znq1W+HsR4PxMesYKG6YuqRAoiUihC5Nn21oG/ab0vM=; b=V6rYmTt78kBBfetZVYnRpXFS0qVkuALkaZEGdPzCszJaI9QPFfj/llf2 OwgKrZo95URS7b7Ls8B0VWebEXaEcFhBxa3WIQnSbHanf4ah6izmzYQzd chsA2E2PPO45ybuhu809Elc4X6QreC3fu64aVBC2IgLUVp7vkfCtv5ycM w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Fsxq9xxzks3XHmbXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YhWN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZudFU3mJvPwcwQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BTAADGfMtd/5BdJa1lHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgWoHAQELAYEbL1AFgUQgBAsqhCmDRgOEWoYbg12XAYEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhEACF4IGJDQJDgIDCwEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhVICAQMSEQoTAQE3AQ8CAQYCDicNAgICMCUCBA4FIoMAgXpNAy4BApJykGMCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFhRYYghcJgTYBhRmGehiBQD+BEScfghc1PodVMoIskAyFQ4k+jwkKgiaVRRuZfag9AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFSOYFYcBVlAYJBUBEUkRoMF4NQilN0gSiPcQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,299,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="369415593"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Nov 2019 03:49:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (xch-rcd-015.cisco.com [173.37.102.25]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAD3nZxr015735 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:49:35 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:34 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:34 -0600
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:49:33 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jagiuv9K+Di3UprnSyl2xtQOucEQLqsIh2VBXEvHDrikMvmB3N5OvOpYwlwBasW+E5kXEbDh+0YbRWAbSkYEE0e3tj/UQnevAGKdO3SjHTVjN2PiDxndteTCde62zcRq7hrcYw5PIeZBQREgHlYqAziBHnt1bh4KhyFK9utyWtbETHO9Yb12KTOC8WQwo6zYEaH6rciClJWnioWBRBLd7j436b1QRfGfMWhiKLBxsdJd0Bn09bview6xgjLrpdH0Y/YWtYd+RDWO/+gElWczxavFUILuoAaAbsdRkRFE8EdS+lU7qNckxqPt32mReZwQTZA/u7AO4T5/eB2+aX0CCg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Znq1W+HsR4PxMesYKG6YuqRAoiUihC5Nn21oG/ab0vM=; b=ZRd78Gf2swCuOjspObx3yGSBZ0+XjG5w3nW2Lzvqd/dLXzac2d3/bieGNU+AKKHYtaAIcKgobiHFvYvzx15NlAJ/mEAtb9L5K9kTMjxNh1f+acUZdos/AlMAhjNsgKfNWVIcA7D9vq8f1XkmuJNxknNr9tXCXgJJGfJdglYmQdkq/JOvPs6ReDB7ds6Iswd2qEHm+PPDE7oVuQ/LC8rMyILrSfoxsb7k8TPmd+w49s9ttlHah+fyAf8MwcPj/f0Gdak/bP6Hk6XyWWTL63doEvg/xENnTO4ezhDUmUmbyYuCxHXHlQClwy6+SUn6VFGwA6Xz07t/lQO35AA9G6g1Tg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Znq1W+HsR4PxMesYKG6YuqRAoiUihC5Nn21oG/ab0vM=; b=oJK5gcsbUpuKrj1/ER/jad4FTAa2K+/fEJgb30Y0TKxx75kAAZiyvWjZcFFg29W+Yc+yQhqFgVZGeyDJvkmD16lT6yn27rS0CSy4cOtiDt/V3DIoxtxaMnoFnhYaWwTCZwVfu14VibNEJaJvz3y0BrALV3P9u5jErByDuEGPqXA=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB4032.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.149.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.24; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:49:31 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3037:66f1:dc79:b564]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3037:66f1:dc79:b564%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2451.023; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:49:31 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment.all@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04
Thread-Index: AQHVlPdRdAzM57x8DkqeVzdB76HcJ6d/f0lAgAC5jgCAABTpfoAAEuIAgADiCfCABsLjgIAAQ4WlgAAJDACAAC6oyA==
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:49:31 +0000
Message-ID: <2CE1215B-FC49-48E0-B5C3-CC347E4B329F@cisco.com>
References: <157308179603.20089.3680167711838185681@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB356517192D428E8181F7FB06D8780@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <MWHPR21MB0784B933306ADFFE22E0B2E5A3780@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <426C0687-C855-4948-AB27-DD824B990294@cisco.com> <MWHPR21MB07842508826ECF3B53A2C298A3780@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR11MB3565CCD02EEF202772EA76C3D87B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <MWHPR21MB078430BA7D9A1B7E504DEAC6A3770@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <9A9B7CE2-0793-4E82-86E0-90CF25F30120@cisco.com>, <MWHPR21MB078448F9FEF4B07FF0E90106A3760@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR21MB078448F9FEF4B07FF0E90106A3760@MWHPR21MB0784.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:588c:1252:f50b:77fa:84f:aecd]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1b729fed-a311-4598-9484-08d767ec7dbb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4032:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4032AA890C1EBF5F0273047AD8760@MN2PR11MB4032.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0220D4B98D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(99286004)(25786009)(33656002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(54906003)(6506007)(76176011)(14454004)(36756003)(6116002)(45080400002)(790700001)(478600001)(76116006)(6436002)(91956017)(66946007)(102836004)(7736002)(5660300002)(229853002)(1511001)(6486002)(86362001)(316002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(8676002)(46003)(186003)(446003)(81156014)(11346002)(2906002)(81166006)(6916009)(6246003)(6512007)(8936002)(54896002)(476003)(2616005)(486006)(4326008)(256004)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4032; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: LlKUIl25ZvHyCHG8zOrwPPzYmFR1w7/OHvQ4Qc3bCNl53dsQ5kaHV2hkjokqin2WmKyiah3RPRXDKZg6KuoFJMeTbAiUH7XIVFoMi5f1IPgND8IlG24pHPd3SHkCG6puizY9dLC0ZjKIAQ3aE3qPDeUuZ0mUHmNBtXs7rccbvQ2Hyw4nhiARuVOsgtRBxxe4HNLXQZ481uIb77zPF9RPMUr/GebYbtpI137eN6cz68GTVtk4Cn6l994vfhOhGjJTMhCwun6DVJnj9B3L9vO5XWzQo+1yIHkR6tDP8N4VIG8fhaQElIXkBGPUIHuhz38a0whALbE/KwNl04+F+gRGQzUFbhR/7SvAIqwaVqY+/+kDTLy02cGixS8k8d9ABhBNHtpcnoX9aQrTHIaj6zQprwz+h+HP/Fnnk6FoqER0pFliJ8ljTX3MG7cKAkvbLo4i
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2CE1215BFC4948E0B5C3CC347E4B329Fciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1b729fed-a311-4598-9484-08d767ec7dbb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Nov 2019 03:49:31.3803 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SWm4XBGLAuPK2QBgh/z4DWeaSU9zPhyOhGoMSiqHXslX7/2jTHuD7zJD9dd8u9GDbZt/vHVbwjmPJmUlxCa4Nw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4032
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.25, xch-rcd-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/snHyru9EtrG0isI3HtqBMPb7fM4>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:49:41 -0000

Hello Dave

Le 13 nov. 2019 à 09:02, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> a écrit :


Pascal wrote:
[…]

   of the destination.  Upon a first fragment, a node creates a state
   and forwards the fragment.

I’d recommend “a node *attempts to* create state and forward the fragment”,
since either of those could potentially fail, right?

Also should this use normative language (“a node MUST…”)?

The state is then used to forward the
   next fragments of the datagram.



Ø  I’d suggest MAY attempt to create the state and if successful MUST use it to forward the next fragments.

To me, that sounds like an inappropriate use of MAY.  MAY means an implementer can choose to ignore it.
Do you really mean that an implementer can choose NOT to attempt to create the state?
If it doesn’t implement attempting to create the state, then how could the mechanism work at all?


I intended the MAY to indicate that the FF mechanism is optional. The node can always do what it did so far and either recompose the full packet to forward it or drop the packet for reasons of its own.

It could split in 2 sentences; say that the mechanism is OPTIONAL and then that when it is used the node MUST attempt to create the state; would that clarify ?


[..]


Ø  I hope you’ll be able to attend 6lo. We need to clarify the goal of the draft and the target info vs. std track.

I just checked the schedule, and I yes can attend 6lo now.
(I think there was a conflict in the draft agenda that is no longer present in the final agenda.)


Great !

Pascal

Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email