IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Focusing the charter

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Fri, 14 June 2013 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C3821F9CB5 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoLjPkZx5Q8y for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22a.google.com (mail-vb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BD121F9CA2 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i3so685142vbh.29 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nNfR4SfFgC4T/GXTtGhr4xaURvXQnbHP4pi2fGj4O9o=; b=rsqeHHM9o1CAIVzco6e7uKu60GK96nwLjE6Pw6RySvOTVYXfaP6DkzOFNF2jbV4Rwv 4XzkyHLW+i2AldP+QpKBu9Nih7pUYl8su2miRH7exY6+tCghVYcZO+3WaBSSbtgnCuD2 rTdLQENVzy2J73q9wUuB/jZR4XylU1dFGy7eg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nNfR4SfFgC4T/GXTtGhr4xaURvXQnbHP4pi2fGj4O9o=; b=U5FDLsm2XaGX8pm3txCdAD6rXRYAea+9Cll4QfxEap2lShAxaqHsivmY+CZK6j/XEE O90k8blzFNt2CYDp6NjAXZ6qdudqic4PL7BTkM6eXUDvbdRKZsL6Yh3JuRVJNuA2QpcB zvA65ytkfKYyCvbhBD2BIZhrM6Mzv2nC3PiOSw7p/4ptA99dcpOV9qgm0ftuITmQK9EK hpFR7cbJNMp97JLXAjCQyC8iM+Z36D/8mwTQwynzUY//YdEeQ+x8TjMYXdSfoY6+NCpj tujvgSXXeMozZLfKqKhJqey+WwHXSZCPCVcLotoK5YKwIYliSG1mvdYaOOeGHlnO0GEy O96w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.59.2.199 with SMTP id bq7mr1337162ved.51.1371234092064; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.29.7 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51BB5D82.5030602@mulligan.com>
References: <DFF38ACA-5099-4EC0-B1BA-4FA977CC246F@tzi.org> <A13EB629-B1AC-4AA8-9DDB-EDAC691921FE@tzi.org> <CAK=bVC-pSY9qSbMew30HghQttTFuDc4B1hgO10Xsr9AnMtSdhA@mail.gmail.com> <6805.1371231731@sandelman.ca> <51BB5D82.5030602@mulligan.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:21:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC_uhbtnzc5EooJiZyX3ySrafYzdPZGCWsPL95NeHfJcPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: Geoff Mulligan <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUWdXfID5VK0PWLmkVGh0MhO+B0aFtyOk2ghDhRAf3QXSqPlOQnwHJxU6LDAmfZty65alq
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] Focusing the charter
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:21:36 -0000

Geoff,

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Geoff Mulligan
<geoff.ietf@mulligan.com> wrote:
> Ulrich: Why can't SNMP be used over 6lowpans?  I don't see what would
> technically stop it from being used or from working.

That is an interesting question that (I think) was part of a
to-be-done gap analysis in the COMAN draft. The main question would be
if SNMP has too much overhead for constrained devices and networks
(both in terms of payload and stack size). Has anyone deployed SNMP in
such networks and on constrained devices?

Best regards
Ulrich

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email