Re: [6lo] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F79F3A16C8; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ZoLzD1jo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=0gIg4CzQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52hJZThK2TQK; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7BE3A16BB; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9783; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583924167; x=1585133767; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=+2Dl9SUxeUAxU4W3B+kaAIkGIq5T7UnSQh237704F1Q=; b=ZoLzD1joFXIwfHOy+bJhZMeY0u7x6CNdpZkWp438GKxc9NV3q7Zh4Y2w sOoKU/QnGthHMH1Mn6NyEOHNfMOc51F1t1YNL1X7T277eKNqKFyp1oVkK 7JMKmAX5P8F7u5PdwdT0wRaoss9Xa0JtoMct8cW4Vq1jVtGhygSIjJW3P A=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Ae5hLIBSRavgL4aNU8SHFNdaImtpsv++ubAcI9p?= =?us-ascii?q?oqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH1?= =?us-ascii?q?5g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiEkDcJJV1JN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C0CABjw2he/5JdJa1LGhwBAQEBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?BAREBBAQBAYF7gSUvJCwFbFggBAsqhBWDRQOKdII6JYljiVCEYoFCgRADVAk?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAQEjCgIEAQGEQwIXgXQkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhWMBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?DEhEdAQE3AREBCBEDAQIrAgQfER0KBAENBSKCfwQBAYF9TQMuAQ48ngkCgTm?= =?us-ascii?q?IYnWBMoJ/AQEFhQwNC4IMAwaBOIwsGoFBP4ERJwwUgk0+ghtJBBqBDxw+DYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?kMoIskGuFc5kQRAqCPI9MgmeEOB2bOooZhGOLL5AlAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIg0?= =?us-ascii?q?FgUZwFWUBgkFQGA2OHQwXg1CFFIVBdAKBJ41GAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,540,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="742214676"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Mar 2020 10:56:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BAu5tE002882 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:56:06 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:56:05 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:56:05 -0500
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:56:05 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; =?utf-8?q?b=3DJGtKZRWOwNrUPaanVNdaIbF2IRi87NUh/nnxGDFLt0b9NfzkpBUeKLA49LcfI?= =?utf-8?q?qmL7GepKAAJA6kvvgsc9WPBynnJcD8y9asfFR+InH7S9/lKE1J9zU9O3VfFNStDuE?= =?utf-8?q?SefAPnQst1X6CqeIPVt8bnQJhBhlKgQA5M8tqAS5C/wckp7R5c9zfBRKh0WXT3hAp?= =?utf-8?q?bKjw/j99A2pqwzGjF0Cq4o2XjdN0Yugi+hCzk1Bacm9QOqDKV5XhKGR6Bs7Q10JlJ?= =?utf-8?q?kGSnPHH56Qr09rkO9bT4YFiGGe/toFqLyVNWupsgIwxj+CIcywVe4ImskqvVG1ksD?= =?utf-8?q?d21l1oBYt/6secP4STa0w=3D=3D?=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; =?utf-8?q?h=3DFrom=3ADate=3ASubject=3AMessage-ID=3ACont?= =?utf-8?q?ent-Type=3AMIME-Version=3AX-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck=3B?= =?utf-8?q?bh=3D+2Dl9SUxeUAxU4W3B+kaAIkGIq5T7UnSQh237704F1Q=3D=3B_b=3DSC8Q8P?= =?utf-8?q?cA/FRkatWbiqh67Z/QrQfDbjwLa9MGMltmVPWkPl/cBSV5vjyEfIebsGYuSqBDQhA?= =?utf-8?q?pOl6lMvZq/9UiXc1l7bWqmiS9Bca2gpv1e5EYC12T99tT7A2rLj1shpdUjk/kdsEB?= =?utf-8?q?4hGwHpRAatP4eUaVYnecXb/lReRcXLJyNLZvm+LH0JSjQkddLD4S2sDeBtA9M4Cbf?= =?utf-8?q?rZSdROpL0xDflqpNfzOTNvVFp4M62u2nGMeSNTFMcUppnrXAUe2VtD5e8FEsdgqS7?= =?utf-8?q?ljqKSkyYgTdaspGu8fsFWZbo9w0qNnbfLlE8qhBksY156ldivJ/Ml6D1LzLO6U2of?= =?utf-8?q?gpS7wzXq5ng=3D=3D?=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; =?utf-8?q?h=3DFrom=3ADate=3ASubject=3AM?= =?utf-8?q?essage-ID=3AContent-Type=3AMIME-Version=3AX-MS-Exchange-SenderADC?= =?utf-8?q?heck=3B_bh=3D+2Dl9SUxeUAxU4W3B+kaAIkGIq5T7UnSQh237704F1Q=3D=3B_b?= =?utf-8?q?=3D0gIg4CzQ7iymwnjPGaIkjFTwt3LVImCZIRFrNXcj3vZ5OZeyDc+IVJzpxFq4uY?= =?utf-8?q?qQOH1NUrvDA9EgjarXG8ID1hNeP396UnkmgCFCT84DUPQw0lUgJbhOrnYTR0flnEp?= =?utf-8?q?l0e/E+WJckXCQHfFcRrNcRqLzOUQS3OvsEtM6DqyYhQI=3D?=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1820.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:111::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.14; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:56:02 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2793.018; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:56:02 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
CC: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>, "suresh@kaloom.com" <suresh@kaloom.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves
Thread-Index: AQHV95On2cdfPwd310mbO1JvERK77A==
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:56:02 +0000
Message-ID: <03768408-BDAD-429A-9A1C-4CFEEDD08140@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:e82e:4bdf:68b:25cb]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5160bc64-7345-457f-c359-08d7c5aaca58
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1820:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: =?utf-8?q?=3CDM5PR11MB1820A7C7893ADC4CA35C9BC0A9F?= =?utf-8?q?C0=40DM5PR11MB1820=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0339F89554
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; =?utf-8?q?SFS=3A=2810009020=29=284636?= =?utf-8?b?MDA5KSgzOTYwMDMpKDEzNjAwMykoMzY2MDA0KSgzOTg2MDQwMDAwMikoMzQ2?= =?utf-8?b?MDAyKSgzNzYwMDIpKDE5OTAwNCkoMzY3NTYwMDMpKDc2MTE2MDA2KSg2NjQ3?= =?utf-8?q?6007=29=2866946007=29=2866556008=29=2891956017=29=2866446008=29?= =?utf-8?b?KDY0NzU2MDA4KSgzMTYwMDIpKDMzNjU2MDAyKSgyOTA2MDAyKSg0MzI2MDA4KSgx?= =?utf-8?q?10136005=29=2816799955002=29=2854906003=29=2886362001=29=28566030?= =?utf-8?b?MDAwMikoNjQ4NjAwMikoODExNjYwMDYpKDg5MzYwMDIpKDE4NjAwMykoMjYx?= =?utf-8?b?NjAwNSkoODExNTYwMTQpKDY1MTIwMDcpKDg2NzYwMDIpKDY1MDYwMDcpKDcx?= =?utf-8?q?200400001=29=28478600001=29=2845080400002=29=28966005=29=28535460?= =?utf-8?q?11=29=3B?= DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1820; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: =?utf-8?q?6b+1p1VMeE4/UvGd3cRu6DlY2YuT4pJ?= =?utf-8?q?BGPAZOq3uXfuwyZtwTyM65RE+XaJo8X0EebNYOh9/ywrYvD5I1M88rTF2oJRL35iw?= =?utf-8?q?b6gWbAvfJ+Vh0mfDrCytMnxZi9Te30hRe4F+MgdLnALBAN1ynYITNomAKHx3RG5x6?= =?utf-8?q?XRK1MiCp92pZaQmonHAaBqJNX0JYmvGSJuyzCCuMY4PMOQLhvt0t6IvekF0a4zlpn?= =?utf-8?q?/pdK6K8rK+0BLcnsDoaCke47jYEGZIyVR/FJaPv58LQWWwVU2kJWSmSxrLvQc1a+6?= =?utf-8?q?xn5HBsR69QAmqKW3TKHJFssm4UQsP2WTX2wQyJ3BeAkyM5AwbvLfEsOZnaAvpFQIu?= =?utf-8?q?NyvYD2t+s+kRMY/bECux2Ex0ra473Pa8xx+yKxaDGLDmVRzhsPI+xsGw1tdBhQkxW?= =?utf-8?q?RzLVMsLGXnop7RLaGuRgH3fi1aQ1ZQ2vCTvUadR+FbRu4qoDsShG8RIy8hV8kqscs?= =?utf-8?q?2Evei5AHSjbcORWlUblIJ1zuMKQtXXAsvyY6+zRpJSgzBXlw=3D=3D?=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?utf-8?q?CznFuzQvvaB8Qbj2/uYoSN25q9SCB7?= =?utf-8?q?Ir5rHaHip3XV9U8prwbES00egQtuXF0aI8iJYdGj/3xLO/qNfEa8tp8fAGrvHEKl4?= =?utf-8?q?bBgERDyQZs0o8AYGl/zoyOD6weuIjKb5YMiZVQuJ17u9yOPnGyYRE1ojTrsoKT8f2?= =?utf-8?q?sV3VsKmAWm5az0F1/odO8r1qPKCI3n9itGgYyrht+u+2zEW5ITAZrg=3D=3D?=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_03768408BDAD429A9A1C4CFEEDD08140ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5160bc64-7345-457f-c359-08d7c5aaca58
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Mar 2020 10:56:02.4952 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: =?utf-8?q?uE+Bbtq5rQhQIGoHT0LZ+?= =?utf-8?q?nD9J0K58rNoYWMqNflT0EuGPxNRFlVzUZRXaYsDzfrKnDMSZ1Bdv6evAjw0VKW5QQ?= =?utf-8?q?=3D=3D?=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1820
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/z9qEehyQ7etTayWxd2j4ZePN6Ag>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:56:09 -0000

Looping to IoT-directorate

-éric

From: 6lo <6lo-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 09:26
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>rg>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Cc: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>om>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>om>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [6lo] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves

Dear all :

As you may know, draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves is blocking the whole cluster C130 https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C310 and we want to ship it now (WG milestone: Mar 2020 - Initial submission). The issue we have with it is the fact that we allow encapsulate the ARO status in a RPL status and we need bits to signal that.

To free the necessary bits the proposal on the table is to reduce the possible values for the ARO status to 0-63.
This can be done by a simple IANA action that can be taken from draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves but we wanted to ensure that both ROLL and 6lo agree with the proposal:


12.1.  Resizing the ARO Status values

   IANA is requested to modify the Address Registration Option Status
   Values Registry as follows: The unassigned values range is reduced
   from 11-255 to 11-63.


NB: this will free 2 bits in the Extended Address Registration Option and the Extended Duplicate Address Message, could become handy in the future.

Is there an issue with this that we are missing?

Pascal