[6lowapp] Question: applicability of OpenHAN requirements
Arjun Roychowdhury <arjun.lists@hsc.com> Tue, 17 November 2009 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <arjunrc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 1E14D3A68F4 for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:40:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6JddGJJnQW3 for
<6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f203.google.com (mail-qy0-f203.google.com
[209.85.221.203]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6B23A68EC for
<6lowapp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk41 with SMTP id 41so126859qyk.29 for <6lowapp@ietf.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:40:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=P5+1d4Fri5bEYxbhP46UbBR/sLccrpH2fXwTxlwkhzw=;
b=LrYNiJWrHU0Qn3L8UpmzRppg3kCeXlHOnZm0uQIgyimRN3vqpgycE59Qyl6OG+PV7c
Xrc5MfooCw45OVj9z9Ku2k8fwQInY2J6RKZ5onWr+iUDbiXiarcK+IhgpPL07mEex5Y7
E/Sduws41PDH4x6lcMJCQXtnS/Bdqr651xr4c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:from:date:x-google-sender-auth
:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
b=HlDWMiJj6fo5vU7jHreGONHSCJQn+bi26+GQRUKrF7i+ChiuQSFjk001N+n5sKArmQ
PNEi+UI2PacLJIEdzMQ14FDkXy12FvaOlgOrkF9a4jy99/0oQV9xVuy3oKGHk/yDX29H
PFWs6R9oAqdBGDPXVIuH1JoxPtuxA5SWqbhtU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: arjunrc@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.36.142 with SMTP id t14mr5713506qad.17.1258476043132;
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:40:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Arjun Roychowdhury <arjun.lists@hsc.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:40:23 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 59248252f2512c1b
Message-ID: <a9994e940911170840s2b80cf58s63a91308a63eaedb@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6lowapp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88ca5c82615f047893c91d
Subject: [6lowapp] Question: applicability of OpenHAN requirements
X-BeenThere: 6lowapp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: arjun.lists@hsc.com
List-Id: Application protocols for constrained nodes and networks
<6lowapp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>,
<mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowapp>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowapp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>,
<mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:40:48 -0000
Hi, does this group intend to map the 2008 OpenHAN requirements to the various nodes being defined (example CoGII, restricted devices, smart devices) etc. ? ( http://www.utilityami.org/docs/UtilityAMI%20HAN%20SRS%20-%20v1.04%20-%20080819-1.pdf) ? regds arjun -- Arjun Roychowdhury
- [6lowapp] Question: applicability of OpenHAN requ… Arjun Roychowdhury