IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowapp] [6lowpan] hardware trends, new vs. existing protocols [Re: 4861 usage in LLNs]

"Stuber, Michael" <Michael.Stuber@itron.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Stuber@itron.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8333A6930; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:57:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_63=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyOlH8Aa+1Lm; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:57:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer-1.itron.com (mailer-1.itron.com [198.182.8.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB403A6921; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:57:46 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:58:15 -0800
Message-ID: <05C6A38D732F1144A8C4016BA4416BFE0242D3B2@SPO-EXVS-02.itron.com>
In-Reply-To: <7DADDFD8-D1E1-4DF2-BD57-1A8ED1CFA5B0@tzi.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [6lowpan] hardware trends, new vs. existing protocols [Re: 4861 usage in LLNs]
Thread-Index: AcphuHr+x5xRkMqERK2++6ZB2roPTQAAWbVA
References: <87y6mfwbfk.fsf@kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com><1257809361.11184.123.camel@dellx1><BCFFD6A3-8B4F-49CF-A657-DE34485134E1@tzi.org><4AF8C20C.3070905@eecs.berkeley.edu><9256B623-E13C-4EB3-9DE9-F850F2E828AC@tzi.org><6B8DDEBE-5550-4795-81E0-DC137114EF83@archrock.com><4AF8D5A0.1020600@eecs.berkeley.edu> <7DADDFD8-D1E1-4DF2-BD57-1A8ED1CFA5B0@tzi.org>
From: "Stuber, Michael" <Michael.Stuber@itron.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Kris Pister <pister@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org>, 6lowapp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowapp] [6lowpan] hardware trends, new vs. existing protocols [Re: 4861 usage in LLNs]
X-BeenThere: 6lowapp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Application protocols for constrained nodes and networks <6lowapp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowapp>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowapp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:57:47 -0000

So Carsten, are you volunteering to guide us on the best way to
misappropriate the protocol?  
:)

-----Original Message-----
From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 7:47 PM
To: Kris Pister
Cc: 6lowpan; 6lowapp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] hardware trends,new vs. existing protocols [Re:
4861 usage in LLNs]

On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:53, Kris Pister wrote:

> +1 in favor of using optimized DHCP if possible (no opinion on 'if  
> possible'), rather than inventing something new.

I'm a big fan of not reinventing the wheel.
When what we need is a cup, however, we should not try to use wheels.
I have lots of experience with misappropriating protocols

Gruesse, Carsten


_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status