IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowapp] the role of gateway nodes

John Mani <jmani@comverge.com> Fri, 27 November 2009 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jmani@comverge.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9173A6970 for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:47:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.572
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nS+AI61I7JBJ for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:47:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newman.comverge.com (unknown [72.1.84.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00523A684D for <6lowapp@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:47:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 24.6.83.145 ([24.6.83.145]) by NEWMAN.comverge.com ([192.168.1.5]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:47:26 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:47:24 -0800
From: John Mani <jmani@comverge.com>
To: Xavi Vilajosana Guillen <xvilajosana@uoc.edu>, "6lowapp@ietf.org" <6lowapp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C735429C.B77F%jmani@comverge.com>
Thread-Topic: [6lowapp] the role of gateway nodes
Thread-Index: AcpvgUtn/TlTTXzaf0G8Rc8iXyhExA==
In-Reply-To: <1220434074.5410511259332678903.JavaMail.root@polinya>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [6lowapp] the role of gateway nodes
X-BeenThere: 6lowapp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Application protocols for constrained nodes and networks <6lowapp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowapp>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowapp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:47:32 -0000

Are there similar issues and how have been addressed in other perhaps
similar areas?

E.g., UPnP or DLNA that uses similar stuff - IP/HTTP, etc.

-john


On 11/27/09 6:37 AM, "Xavi Vilajosana Guillen" <xvilajosana@uoc.edu> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
> 
> I am addressing the problem of application level protocol compatibility
> between Internet and 6LowPan networks. As you may know current Internet
> protocols (http,xmpp...) make use of too heavy headers... my opinion is that a
> protocol transformation is required at gateway level, that is, current
> Internet protocols should be compressed/transformed once they reach a low
> power losy network...
> 
> what's the approach at 6LowApp? anyone knows ongoing work on that issue?
> 
> regards,
> xavier
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowapp mailing list
> 6lowapp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email