Re: [6lowapp] Next version of charter proposal up on 6lowapp.net

Keep in mind though, that much of that bandwidth is shared on these
networks  In an 802.15.4 environment, devices will share a single
channel.  If this work is successful there will be many constrained
nodes within the network, rather than a single pair of nodes.

-----Original Message-----
From: 6lowapp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowapp-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Henning Schulzrinne
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 6:33 PM
To: Benoit Claise
Cc: 6lowapp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowapp] Next version of charter proposal up on
6lowapp.net

I find this conflation of Smart Energy/HAN and LowApp confusing. Most of
the in-home networks are not exactly "challenged". Even ZigBee has 250
kb/s (or 20 kb/s in the lowest-bandwidth mode), i.e., equivalent to
early DSL or 1990's modems.

Henning

On Nov 8, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Benoit Claise wrote:

> Carsten,
>
> Thanks for the new charter proposal.
>
> - "This WG is concentrating on requirements from energy (e.g. Smart 
> Energy 2.0) and building management applications."
> Is the goal to describe these requirements in the "objectives and 
> architecture" document?
> If not, where can we understand those requirements from?
> The following were mentioned on the list:
>
> There are a lot of use cases to start with.  Here is a starter set:
> 1)  OpenHAN:
>
> http://www.utilityami.org/docs/UtilityAMI%20HAN%20SRS%20-%20v1.04%20-%
> 200808
>
> 19-1.pdf
> 2)  SmartGridipedia:
>
> http://www.smartgridipedia.org/index.php/Category:Use_Cases
> , both the
> Intelligrid and Southern California Edison use cases are good
> 3)  ZigBee/HomePlug Market Requirements and Use Cases (which we are 
> using for our Smart Energy V2 work):
>
> http://www.homeplug.org/products/ZBHP_SE_MRD_090624.pdf
> Any other ones?
>
> "The framework will also specify specify a way to support interface 
> profiles, ..."
> Can you expand on "interface profile".
>
>
> "A document with operation and management advice about running a 
> network using these applications."
> Is advice the right word? It seems like one or two advices are 
> sufficient to manage the network ;-)
>
>
> Regards, Benoit.
>> I have put a new version of the WG charter proposal on the wiki  
>> page at
>> http://6lowapp.net
>> =
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/6LowApp
>> (charter text is at the end of the page).
>>
>> Obviously, I could not pick up every comment that was on the list  
>> (they were partially going in conflicting directions), but please  
>> do comment on the new version.
>>
>> Gruesse, Carsten
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowapp mailing list
>> 6lowapp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowapp mailing list
> 6lowapp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp

_______________________________________________
6lowapp mailing list
6lowapp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp