Re: [6lowapp] BOF proposal: update

Enrico Marocco wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>> I'm looking forward to your feedback.
>> I doubt you can leave out security.
> 
> Probably the charter should be clearer that what's out of scope is a
> generic security framework for embedded devices; I certainly don't
> expect documents produced by the proposed WG to have empty Security
> Considerations sections (I don't thing that is the intention though).

Exactly. The security considerations for both work items should be of 
course integral parts of the WG goals. And as you say, we are not 
working on a generic security framework. Under the "what we do not work 
on" section we should add some text about that. Plus in the work items 
we should be specific that security is a part of each item.

Thanks,
Zach

> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowapp mailing list
> 6lowapp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp

-- 
http://www.sensinode.com
http://zachshelby.org - My blog “On the Internet of Things”
Mobile: +358 40 7796297

Zach Shelby
Head of Research
Sensinode Ltd.
Kidekuja 2
88610 Vuokatti, FINLAND

This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain 
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without 
producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof.