Re: [6lowapp] Proposed charter for 6LoWAPP BOF

[Shidan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Cullen, I would check the motivational draft Arjun and I submitted for
SIP.


> OK - The way I want to try and derive us towards a decision here is get a
> list of candidate protocols then for each one ask the yes/no is the their
> agreement that we should do a mapping to that protocol.  The protocols I
> have heard so far are HTTP, SNMP,  SMTP. So two questions
>

1) what other protocols mapping should we do?
>

In general there are many practical applications which are using SIP and
XMPP for M2M communications. This should be a consideration.


>
> 2) Given some people want HTTP, can you live with the answer to HTTP being
> yes and understanding that just because we said yes to HTTP does not mean we
> are saying no to everything else?
>
>
Personally, I think HTTP is the most important and minimum protocol to
support.