Re: [6lowapp] Where does TCP not work

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Great :)

I'm certainly willing to help out here.
 
For the problem of routing in that environment (at ROLL) we produced no
less than 4 requirements drafts, and that certainly helped a lot
figuring what was left to be done. This is because wireless (even Low
Power) is so diverse in its usages and constraints. Following those
tracks we could:

* go back to the requirements we have on transports for the flows we
know of

* see which ones can be accommodated with existing transports and flow
control techniques - produce BCP there - 

* and then see if additional work is needed to accommodate real world
constraints like very femtomatic buffer capacity in the intermediate
routers, and randomized path diversity.

Maybe we could organize a BAR BOF in Anaheim?

Pascal

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of Lars Eggert
>Sent: mardi 3 novembre 2009 22:39
>To: [e-mail]
>Cc: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: [6lowapp] Where does TCP not work
>
>Hi,
>
>On 2009-11-3, at 6:19, Don Sturek wrote:
>> I think there is a Smart Grid bar BOF in Hiroshima.  This is probably
>> in response to the NIST Smart Grid roadmap and "Priority Action Plan"
>> activity
>> (IETF is involved in priority action plan #1, IP for Smart Grid).
>> This
>> might be the place to suggest work on this topic in the Transport
>> area.
>
>that's a reasonable idea, but I think you've all been hanging around
the IETF long enough to realize that any
>such effort will need to be driven by folks who want a solution. In
other words, saying that "the TSV area
>should solve this" and then hoping that someone else will produce a
solution isn't going to happen. We need
>the folks who need a solution put their cycles into designing one (in
TSV, if that's where it'll fit, or
>wherever).
>
>Lars