Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 10 March 2010 22:28 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B46F3A68C1 for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IF44nfJQZLdD for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC7C3A6830 for <6lowapp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com [64.101.72.245]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A681C40D3A for <6lowapp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:28:57 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B981D28.7080408@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:28:56 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lowapp@ietf.org
References: <E4DBD8AB11D2E54F89B23D7CD1065D8CD5185B@onzosbs2k3.ONZO.local> <6f60db82b1ecfde34dc6e5b35e72b36a@mailserver13.nebula.fi>
In-Reply-To: <6f60db82b1ecfde34dc6e5b35e72b36a@mailserver13.nebula.fi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms070803070004050706090109"
Subject: Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core?
X-BeenThere: 6lowapp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Application protocols for constrained nodes and networks <6lowapp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowapp>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowapp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:28:54 -0000
On 3/10/10 3:27 PM, zach@sensinode.com wrote: >> >> I have probably overlooked something here, but has the CoRE WG now taken >> over the 6lowapp work? Is there any distinction between the two groups? > > Well yes, basically. CoRE is the first WG to result from the 6lowapp > interest group and will work on the most urgent issues identified during > the 6lowapp BarBOF and BOF. The old 6lowapp mailing list should disappear > soon - we should use the core list instead from what I understand. >> >> I have found the 6lowapp group website at >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/6LowApp a very useful >> point of reference - it would be great if there was an equivalent CoRE >> page. > > Info about CoRE is now found at: > > http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/core-charter.html > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/core/ > > Sure, we should probably have a Wiki page too? Perhaps the tools team could even move the old 6LowApp wiki to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/core/trac/wiki Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Charles Palmer
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? zach@sensinode.com
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Lars Eggert
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre